How We Do It

Management Of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Induced Hand–Foot Skin Reaction: Viewpoints from the Medical Oncologist, Dermatologist, and Oncology Nurse

We are living in an era of “molecularly targeted therapy.” This targeted approach has developed as advances in science have led to a more detailed understanding of the inner workings of the cell, both in health and in illness. Once a molecular pathway has been implicated in the development and progression of cancer, modulators can be developed to intervene in this



 

How we do it

Management Of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Induced Hand–Foot Skin Reaction: Viewpoints from the Medical Oncologist, Dermatologist, and Oncology Nurse

Elizabeth Manchen RN, MS, OCN

,
, Caroline Robert MD, PhD and Camillo Porta MD

Received 12 August 2010;
accepted 22 November 2010.
Available online 13 February 2011.

Abstract

One significant toxicity associated with the anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR). We provide an overview of HFSR, emphasizing experience-based prevention techniques and nursing management strategies from the viewpoints of a medical oncologist, a dermatologist, and an oncology nurse. Supporting data include (1) published preclinical and phase I–III clinical studies and (2) published abstracts of phase II–III clinical trials of sorafenib and sunitinib. HFSR has been reported in up to 60% of patients treated with sorafenib or sunitinib. TKI-induced HFSR may lead to dose reductions or treatment interruptions and reduced quality of life. Symptoms of TKI-associated HFSR can be managed by implementing supportive measures and aggressive dose modification. Patients educated about HFSR can work with their health-care teams to proactively detect and help manage this cutaneous toxicity, thus preventing or reducing the severity of TKI-associated HFSR. Successful prevention and management of TKI-associated HFSR can help to ensure that patients achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes. Implementation of such measures may increase the likelihood that therapy is continued for the appropriate interval at an appropriate dose for each patient. Optimal management of TKI-associated HFSR is predicated on establishing appropriate partnerships among medical oncologists, dermatologists, oncology nurses, and patients.

Article Outline

The Medical Oncologist's Viewpoint
Molecularly Targeted Agents
Characteristics of Hand–Foot Skin Reaction
Grading HFSR
The Dermatologist's Viewpoint
Incidence and Severity of HFSR With TKI
Management Strategies
The Oncology Nurse's Viewpoint
Summary
Acknowledgements
References
We are living in an era of “molecularly targeted therapy.” This targeted approach has developed as advances in science have led to a more detailed understanding of the inner workings of the cell, both in health and in illness. Once a molecular pathway has been implicated in the development and progression of cancer, modulators can be developed to intervene in this pathway. The goal is to target the cells and pathways specifically involved in the disease process, thereby leaving the normal processes undisturbed. The era of targeted therapy began in the late 1990s when the first targeted anticancer agents received regulatory approval (Figure 1). The targeted therapy armamentarium has since grown, creating a therapeutic landscape in which the chemical destruction of tumors with chemotoxic agents has been either expanded upon or replaced with agents designed to target carcinogenic processes.

Figure 1.

Progress in the Medical Treatment of Cancer

This article reviews the mechanism of action, clinical trial results, and adverse effects of two molecularly targeted anticancer agents, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib (Nexavar®; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Montville, NJ, and Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Emeryville, CA) and sunitinib (Sutent®; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY). This article specifically focuses on the diagnosis and management of TKI-associated hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR) from the perspectives of the medical oncologist, the dermatologist, and the oncology nurse. Data were derived from (1) published reports of preclinical and phase I–III clinical studies of sorafenib and sunitinib and (2) published abstracts of phase II–III clinical trials of sorafenib and sunitinib.

The Medical Oncologist's Viewpoint

Molecularly Targeted Agents

Molecularly targeted therapies are directed at specific mechanisms involved in cell division, invasion, and metastasis, as well as in cell survival mediated by avoidance of apoptosis and resistance to conventional treatments. Clinical trials in several cancer types have shown that these TKIs can inhibit these activities of cancer cells by either cytostatic or cytotoxic mechanisms.1 However, the ability of these agents to inhibit multiple cancer cell pathways via novel mechanisms of action may explain, at least in part, their apparent direct toxic effects.2 These include adverse events that, from a medical viewpoint, must be anticipated, promptly recognized, and properly treated. Doing so can help minimize disruption to the patient's quality of life and may reduce the need for dose reduction or treatment interruption.1

Both sorafenib and sunitinib are orally administered, small-molecule inhibitors of multiple kinases, some of which are common to both agents (Figure 2).3 Sorafenib has known effects on tumor-cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Its antiproliferative effects are exerted via inhibition of serine/threonine kinases of the RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway (also called the MAP-kinase pathway) that is found within tumor cells; specifically, sorafenib targets wild-type RAF gene products (CRAF, BRAF) and mutant BRAF. The antiangiogenic effects of sorafenib are exerted via its inhibition of extracellular vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 2 and 3 (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR-β), which is found mainly in the tumor vasculature. Sorafenib also exerts broad-spectrum activity against the stem-cell growth factor receptor (c-KIT), FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3), and the receptor encoded by the ret proto-oncogene (RET).[4], [5], [6] and [7] Sunitinib has demonstrated effects on the growth, pathologic angiogenesis, and metastatic progression of cancer by inhibiting PDGFR-α and -β; VEGFR-1, -2, and -3; and colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF-1R), c-KIT, Flt3, and RET.8

Pages

Recommended Reading

Cancer Breakthrough Pain in the Presence of Cancer-Related Chronic Pain: Fact versus Perceptions of Health-Care Providers and Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The Challenges of Treating Patients with Cancer Pain
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
A Conceptual Solution to Improve the Management of Cancer-Related Breakthrough Pain
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cost–Utility Analysis of Palonosetron-Based Therapy in Preventing Emesis Among Breast Cancer Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Pilot Study of the Prospective Identification of Changes in Cognitive Function During Chemotherapy Treatment for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Retrospective analysis of communication with patients undergoing radiological breast biopsy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Letter - Acneiform Rash as a Reaction to Radiotherapy in a Breast Cancer Patient
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Efficacy and Safety of Influenza Vaccination During Chemotherapy Treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Patient-reported outcomes in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Acute Kidney Injury in Cancer Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology