How We Do It

Management Of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Induced Hand–Foot Skin Reaction: Viewpoints from the Medical Oncologist, Dermatologist, and Oncology Nurse


 

Table 1. Summary of Efficacy Data for Sorafenib and Sunitinib
DRUG, DISEASE, AND STUDYEFFICACY DATA
Sorafenib
Advanced RCC
Phase III TARGET[9] and [10]

• Largest phase III trial ever conducted in second-line setting in patients with advanced RCC

• Median PFS was 5.5 months in sorafenib group vs 2.8 months in placebo group (P < 0.001)

• 28% improvement in OS vs placebo (HR = 0.72, P = 0.02)

• Significant prolongation of OS (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.97, P = 0.029)

• Clinical benefit (CR + PR + SD) in 84% of patients

Expanded-access programs[11] and [12]Data from expanded-access programs in community-based populations (NA- and EU-ARCCS) were consistent with data from TARGET
Unresectable HCC
Phase III SHARP trial13

• First phase III trial to demonstrate a significant survival advantage for a systemic therapy in advanced HCC

• Median OS was 10.7 months in sorafenib group vs 7.9 months in placebo group (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87, P < 0.001)

• Median TTRP was 5.5 months in sorafenib group vs 2.8 months in placebo group (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74, P < 0.001)

• Disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 43% in sorafenib group vs 32% in placebo group (P = 0.002)

Phase III Asia-Pacific trial14

• Median OS was 6.5 months in sorafenib group vs 4.2 months in placebo group (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.93, P = 0.014)

• Median TTP was 2.8 months in sorafenib group vs 1.4 months in placebo group (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.42–0.79, P = 0.0005)

Sunitinib
Advanced RCC
Phase III registration trial18

• Median PFS was 11 months in sunitinib group vs 5 months in interferon-α group (HR = 0.539, 95% CI 0.451–0.643, P < 0.001)

• Objective response rate (CR + PR) was 47% in sunitinib group vs 12% in interferon-α group (P < 0.001)

• Median OS was 26.4 months in sunitinib group vs 21.8 months in interferon-α group (P = 0.051)

Expanded-access program20

• In a broad population of patients with metastatic RCC who were treated with sunitinib:

– Median PFS was 10.9 months

– Median OS was 18.4 months

Imatinib-resistant GIST
Phase III registration trial15

• Median TTP was 27.3 weeks in sunitinib group vs 6.4 weeks in placebo group (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.23–0.47, P < 0.0001)

• Median PFS was 24.1 weeks in sunitinib group vs 6.0 weeks in placebo group (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.24–0.47, P < 0.0001)

• 16% of sunitinib-treated patients were progression-free for at least 26 weeks compared with 1% of those who received placebo

Expanded-access program17

• In a broad population of patients with imatinib-resistant GIST who were treated with sunitinib:

– Estimated median TTP was 41 weeks

– Estimated median OS was 75 weeks

CI = confidence interval; CR = complete response; EU-ARCCS = European Union Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib; GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; HR = hazard ratio; NA-ARCCS = North American ARCCS; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; PR = partial response; RCC = renal cell carcinoma; SD = stable disease; SHARP = Sorafenib CCC Assessment Randomized Protocol; TARGET = Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial; TTP = time to progression; TTRP = time to radiologic progression


Characteristics of Hand–Foot Skin Reaction

Data from the clinical trials for sorafenib and sunitinib indicate that both agents are generally well-tolerated; common treatment-related adverse reactions include diarrhea, alopecia, nausea, fatigue, rash, and hypertension, as well as palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) syndrome, also known as hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR) (Table 2).[10] and [19] HFSR is a dermatologic toxicity that has been reported in 14%–62% of patients treated with sorafenib or sunitinib (Table 3).[9], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [17], [18], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] and [25] In general, the term HFSR refers to a group of signs and symptoms affecting the hands and feet of patients taking sorafenib, sunitinib, or, to a lesser extent, other TKIs such as pazopanib (Votrient™; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC)[26] and [27] and axitinib (AG013736).[28], [29], [30] and [31]

Table 2. Selected Common Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Sorafenib (n = 452) or Sunitinib (n = 375) in Phase III Registration Trials (Updated and Final Results)[10] and [19]
ADVERSE EVENT
SORAFENIB 400 MG BID
SUNITINIB 50 MG QD
ALL GRADES (%)GRADE 3/4 (%)ALL GRADES (%)GRADE 3/4 (%)
Diarrhea483619
Rash411242
Hand–foot skin reaction336299
Alopecia310120
Fatigue2935411
Nausea19<1525
Hypertension1743012
Dry skin13021<1
Vomiting121314
Mucositis50262
Table 3. Rates of Hand–Foot Skin Reaction in Clinical Trials of Sorafenib and Sunitinib
REFERENCESTUDYALL GRADES (%)GRADE 3 (%)GRADE 4 (%)
Sorafenib
9Phase III TARGETa306 (grade 3/4)
13Phase III SHARPa2180
11NA-ARCCS, first-linea19 (≥2)11 (grade 3/4)
11NA-ARCCS, second-linec17 (≥2)8 (grade 3/4)
12EU-ARCCSa4712 (grade 3/4)
14Phase III Asia-Pacifica4511 (grade 3/4)
24Phase II randomized discontinuation trial in advanced RCCb62130
25Phase II study in advanced HCCb3150
21Phase II, uncontrolled study in relapsed/refractory NSCLCa3710 (grade 3/4)
Sunitinib
18Phase III registration trial in advanced RCCa2050
20Expanded access program in advanced RCCc5 (grade 3/4)
15Phase III registration trial in imatinib-resistant GISTa1440
[17] and [22]Expanded access program in imatinib-resistant GISTcN/A8 (grade 3/4)
23Phase II trial of second-line treatment in advanced RCCa1570

EU-ARCCS = European Union Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib; GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; N/A = data not available; NA-ARCCS = North American ARCCS; NSCLC = non-small-cell lung cancer; RCC = renal cell carcinoma; SHARP = Sorafenib CCC Assessment Randomized Protocol; TARGET = Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial

a Used version 3.0 of National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)b Used version 2.0 of NCI-CTCAEc Version of NCI-CTCAE used not specified

Pages

Recommended Reading

Cancer Breakthrough Pain in the Presence of Cancer-Related Chronic Pain: Fact versus Perceptions of Health-Care Providers and Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The Challenges of Treating Patients with Cancer Pain
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
A Conceptual Solution to Improve the Management of Cancer-Related Breakthrough Pain
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cost–Utility Analysis of Palonosetron-Based Therapy in Preventing Emesis Among Breast Cancer Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Pilot Study of the Prospective Identification of Changes in Cognitive Function During Chemotherapy Treatment for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Retrospective analysis of communication with patients undergoing radiological breast biopsy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Letter - Acneiform Rash as a Reaction to Radiotherapy in a Breast Cancer Patient
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Efficacy and Safety of Influenza Vaccination During Chemotherapy Treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Patient-reported outcomes in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Acute Kidney Injury in Cancer Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology