Recommendations for the treatment of grade 1 HFSR include early and appropriate dermatologic management and active collaboration among HCPs.40
The Dermatologist's Viewpoint
Although the exact pathogenesis of HFSR has not been fully elucidated, research into its cause(s) is ongoing. Theoretically, traditional HFS is thought to be due to the direct toxic effects of drugs or their ability to invoke a “host-vs-host” response. In contrast, a unique mechanism has been proposed for TKI-associated HFSR: simultaneous blockage of VEGFRs and PDGFRs.2
Three histopathologic features have been found to predominate in HFSR: dyskeratotic keratinocytes at various states of necrosis (Figure 441), basal layer vacuolar degeneration, and mild perivascular or lichenoid lymphocyte-predominant infiltrate.2 Immunohistochemistry with a variety of skin-cell markers has shown a significant modification of normal maturation of keratinocytes, which are often apoptotic. Minor modifications of blood vessels are also seen, but no signs of intense vasculitis are evident. This is important because HFSR is suspected of being a “class effect” of TKIs that target VEGFRs. HFSR is not seen in patients treated with single-agent bevacizumab, and the lack of histologic evidence of significant damage to blood vessels suggests that HFSR does not result from the general inhibition of angiogenesis. A retrospective analysis found that HFSR rates were higher when patients were treated with sorafenib and bevacizumab in combination, supporting the hypothesis that HSFR is due to the anti-VEGF properties of sorafenib.42 Other possible causes of HFSR include activation by a ligand other than VEGF and/or inhibition of one of the other protein targets inhibited by both sorafenib and sunitinib.[3] and [35]