Summaries of Must-Read Clinical Literature, Guidelines, and FDA Actions
Better Ways to Diagnose Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Nov; Hiremath, et al
The current approach to the diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is invasive, expensive, and risky. A recent review of the medical literature suggests there are promising technologies available that may make the diagnosis safer, more accurate, and more cost effective.
- The current approach to EoE typically requires several esophagogastroduodenoscopies, sedation/anesthesia, numerous biopsies, the risk of complications, and financial hardship for patients and families.
- Several biomarkers are emerging as possible alternatives or complements to this approach, including absolute eosinophil counts, cytokines such as interleukin 4, 5, and 13, and chemokines such as eotaxin and mast cell tryptase.
- Other diagnostic tools supported by proof of concept evidence include transnasal endoscopy and saliva analysis for cytokines and miRNA.
Hiremath G, Gupta SK. Promising modalities to identify and monitor eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1655-1664. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.05.004.
This Week's Must Reads
Must Reads in Endoscopy, Pancreas, & Biliary Tract
Gender Differences in Patients Hospitalized with Cirrhosis, J Clin Gastroenterol; ePub 2019 Feb 22; Rubin, et al
POC Test for Identifying Viraemic HCV Infection, J Hepatol; ePub 2019 Feb 21; Freiman, et al
Frailty in Patients with Ascites & Hepatic Encephalopathy, Gastroenterology; ePub 2019 Jan 19; Lai, et al
Hypercholesterolemia & Statin Exposure in Cirrhosis, Gastroenterology; ePub 2019 Jan 18; Kaplan, et al
Response to UDCA Treatment in PBC Patients, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; ePub 2019 Jan 4; Cheung, et al