Feature

Drug pricing proposals raise red flags with specialists


 


“We request more clarity on any potential policies that would affect physician reimbursement,” the groups said. “Physicians have no control over the cost of drugs or ancillary services, nor over the severity of illness and comorbidities that drive the need for such services.”

The groups did support a few of the recommendations from the two documents, including requiring Medicare Part D plans to apply a substantial portion of the rebate at point of sale, establishing a Part D out-of-pocket maximum in the catastrophic phase to better protect beneficiaries against high drug costs, decreasing the consolidation by pharmacy benefit managers and others in the supply chain, and providing the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services with guidance on how drug-related value-based contracts and price reporting would affect other price regulations.

“We appreciate HHS’ continued focus on transparency and patient-centered care,” the groups said. “Knowing that HHS is committed to transforming the health care delivery system and the Medicare program by putting a strong focus on patient-centered care, so providers can direct their time and resources to patients and improving outcomes, is reassuring to our providers.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

MDedge Daily News: Three daily meals best in type 2 diabetes
MDedge Rheumatology
How the ADA shapes health care
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: MedPAC targets Medicare’s pay plans
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Stem cells may reverse premature menopause
MDedge Rheumatology
Women in medicine shout #MeToo about sexual harassment at work
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Avoid warfarin’s polypharmacy perils
MDedge Rheumatology
Podcasts
MDedge Rheumatology
‘Right to try’ bill passes House
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Treating H. pylori slashed new gastric cancers
MDedge Rheumatology
Rheumatologists push back on feds’ association health plan proposal
MDedge Rheumatology