Feature

Drug pricing proposals raise red flags with specialists


 


“We worry that moving Part B drugs into Part D may lead to access issues and force patients into higher cost sites of care,” the groups said.

Third, the White House is proposing to cut Part B drug reimbursement to physicians from the current average sales price plus 6% down to ASP+3% for new drugs.

The groups said that with the budget sequestration currently in place, “the existing Part B payment structure does not adequately cover the costs of obtaining and providing these complex therapies in an outpatient setting. If additional payment cuts or negative changes are implemented or activated through demonstration projects, many patients would be forced into more expensive, less convenient settings to receive their therapies – if an alternative setting is available at all in their areas.”

Finally, the groups mention a proposal that would introduce physician reimbursement that is not tied to drug pricing. But this option is not expanded upon in the Council of Economic Advisors report.

Recommended Reading

MDedge Daily News: Three daily meals best in type 2 diabetes
MDedge Rheumatology
How the ADA shapes health care
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: MedPAC targets Medicare’s pay plans
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Stem cells may reverse premature menopause
MDedge Rheumatology
Women in medicine shout #MeToo about sexual harassment at work
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Avoid warfarin’s polypharmacy perils
MDedge Rheumatology
Podcasts
MDedge Rheumatology
‘Right to try’ bill passes House
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Treating H. pylori slashed new gastric cancers
MDedge Rheumatology
Rheumatologists push back on feds’ association health plan proposal
MDedge Rheumatology