Clinical Edge

Summaries of Must-Read Clinical Literature, Guidelines, and FDA Actions

Cytosponge vs Biopsy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Am J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; Katzka, et al

Although endoscopy and biopsy are typically used to diagnose eosinophilic esophagitis, a recent study suggests that having patients swallow a miniature sponge—the cytosponge—provides a minimally invasive yet accurate alternative for diagnosing the disorder. To reach that conclusion, investigators used both methods and compared results using eosinophil counts (EoE) to gauge their relative value.

  • 105 procedures were done on 80 patients.
  • Researchers found a strong correlation between biopsy and cytosponge results, using EoE at or above 15 3eos/HPF as a gold standard.
  • Sensitivity of cytosponge was 75%.
  • Specificity of cytosponge was 86%.
  • The cytosponge did not cause any complications.

Citation:

Katzka DA, Smyrk TC, Alexander JA, et al. Accuracy and safety of the cytosponge for assessing histologic activity in eosinophilic esophagitis: A two-center study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1528-1544. doi:10.1038/ajg.2017.244.