Principles to make a spiritual assessment work in your practice

,; ,

Applied Evidence

Principles to make a spiritual assessment work in your practice

J Fam Pract. 2004 August;53(8):625-631

By

Robert T. Lawrence, MD, MEd

Dwight W. Smith, MD

PDF Download

References

1. Osler W. The faith that heals. BMJ 1910;June 18:1470-1472.

2. Matthews D, McCullough M, Larson D, Koenig H, Sawyers J, Milano M. Religious commitment and health status: a review of the research and implications for family medicine. Arch Fam Med 1998;7:118-124.

3. Helm H, Hays J, Flint E, Koenig H, Blazer D. Does private religious activity prolong survival? A six-year follow-up study of 3,851 older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:M400-M405.

4. Oxman T, Freeman D, Manheimer E. Lack of social participation or religious strength and comfort as risk factors for death after cardiac surgery in the elderly. Psychosom Med 1995;57:5-15.

5. Koenig H, Cohen H, George L, Hays J, Larson D, Blazer D. Attendance at religious services, interleukin-6, and other biological parameters of immune function in older adults. Int J Psychiatry Med 1997;27:233-250.

6. Woods T, Antoni M, Ironson G, Kling D. Religiosity is associated with affective and immune status in symptomatic HIV-infected gay men. J Psychosom Res 1999;46:165-176.

7. Koenig H, George L, Meador K, Blazer D, Ford S. Religious practices and alcoholism in a southern adult population. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1994;45:225-231.

8. Pargament K, Koenig H, Tarakeshwar N, Hahn J. Religious struggle as a predictor of mortality among medically ill elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1881-1885.

9. Anandarajah G, Hight E. Spirituality and medical practice: using the HOPE questions as a practical tool for spiritual assessment. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:81-88.

10. Post S, Puchalski C, Larson D. Physicians and patient spirituality: professional boundaries, competency, and ethics. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:578-583.

11. Maugans T, Wadland W. Religion and family medicine: a survey of physicians and patients. J Fam Pract 1991;32:210-213.

12. Ehman J, Ott B, Short T, Ciampa R, Hansen-Flaschen J. Do patients want physicians to inquire about their spiritual or religious beliefs if they become gravely ill? Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1803-1806.

13. Block S. Psychological considerations, growth, and transcendence at the end of life. JAMA 2001;285:2898-2905.

14. Sloan R, Bagiella E, VandeCreek L, et al. Should physicians prescribe religious activities? N Engl J Med 2000;342:1913-1916.

15. Koenig G, Idler E, Kasl S, et al. Religion, spirituality, and medicine: a rebuttal to skeptics. Int J Psychiatry Med 1999;29:123-131.

16. Sloan R, Bagiella E, Powell T. Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet 1999;353:664-667.

17. Buryska J. Assessing the Ethical weight of cultural, religious and spiritual claims in the clinical context. J Med Ethics 2001;27:118-122.

18. Lo B, Ruston D, Kates L, Arnold R, Cohen C, Faber-Langendoen K, et al. Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life. a practical guide for physicians. JAMA 2002;287:749-754.

19. Matthews D, McCullough M, Larson D, Koenig H, Swyers J, Milano M. Religious commitment and health status: a review of the research and implications for family medicine. Arch Fam Med 1998;7:118-124.

20. Mueller P, Plevak D, Rummans T. Religious involvement, spirituality, and medicine: implications for clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:1225-1235.

21. Levin J, Puchalski C. Religion and spirituality in medicine: research and education. JAMA 1997;278:792-793.

22. Blumenthal D. Quality of health care, part 1: quality of care—what is it? N Engl J Med 1996;335:891-894.

23. Shum C, Humphreys A, Wheeler D, Cochrane M, Skoda S, Clement S. Nurse management of patients with minor illnesses in general practice: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2000;320:1038-1043.

24. Venning P, Durie A, Roland M, Roberts C, Leese B. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. BMJ 2000;320:1048-1053.

25. Jaen C, Stange K, Nutting P. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract 1994;38:166-171.

26. Goodwin M, Flocke S, Borawski E, Zyzanski S, Stange K. Direct observation of health-habit counseling of adolescents. Arch Ped Ado Med 1999;153:367-373.

27. Fleming M, Manwell L, Barry K, Adams W, Stauffacher E. Brief physician advice for alcohol problems in older adults: a randomized community-based trial. J Fam Pract 1999;48:378-384.

28. Ellis M, Vinson D, Ewigman B. Addressing spiritual concerns of patients. J Fam Pract 1999;48:105-109.

29. Merenstein D, Green L, Fryer G, Dovey S. Shortchanging adolescents: room for improvement in preventive care by physicians. Fam Med 2001;33:120-123.

30. Schoenberg N, Campbell K, Johnson M. Physicians and clergy as facilitators of formal services for older adults. J Aging Soc Policy 1999;11(1):9-26.

31. Idler E, Kasl S. Religion among disabled and nondisabled persons ii: attendance at religious services as a predictor of the course of disability. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997;52:S306-S316.

32. Koenig H, Larson D. Use of hospital services, religious attendance, and religious affiliation. South Med J 1998;91:925-932.

33. Strawbridge W, Cohen R, Shema S, Kaplan G. Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years. Am J Pub Health 1997;87:957-968.

34. Koenig H, George L, Hays J, Larson D, Cohen H, Blazer D. The relationship between religious activities and blood pressure in older adults. Int J Psychiatry Med 1998;28:189-213.

35. Koenig H, Cohen H, Blazer D, Kudler H, Drishnan K, Sibert T. Religious coping and cognitive symptoms of depression in elderly medical patients. Psychosomatics 1995;36(4):369-375.

36. Koenig H, George L, Peterson B. Religiosity and remission of depression in medically ill older adults. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:536-542.

Practice recommendations

Consider the research showing that spiritual faith is an ally to health and positive health behaviors, and that many patients rely on their spiritual beliefs in times of illness (C).
Regardless of personal ethic, physicians need a set of principles to guide decisions concerning the appropriateness of addressing spiritual issues when such issues arise in the clinical setting (C).
The EBQT (Evidence-Belief-Quality Care-Time) paradigm provides a natural set of principles for consistent clinical decision-making regarding spiritual or alternative adjuncts to medical therapy (C).

In recent years, physicians have been encouraged to assess their patient’s spiritual sources of strength or stress when taking a medical history. However, the decision to act on such information can be ethically complex. Physicians may feel apprehensive about delving into spiritual issues in clinical practice without clear ethical guidelines as to which actions may, or may not, be taken in response to information gained from such an inquiry. This paper introduces the EBQT paradigm, a set of 4 principles designed to guide physicians who wish to address clinically relevant spiritual issues in their practice.

Need for guidelines

The contribution of a patient’s personal faith to the success or failure of medical care has long been a subject of interest to physicians. Sir William Osler, contrasting the beneficial and harmful effects of various expressions of faith, called it “an essential factor in the practice of medicine.”¹ Research highlights both the beneficial aspects of a patient’s spiritual faith,^2-7 and the harmful effects of religious struggle in regard to illness⁸ or lack of strength and comfort from religion.¹⁰

Due to the potential relevance of spiritual beliefs and practices, many authors^9-13 recommend that physicians include a brief spiritual assessment when taking a patient’s medical history. A decision to act on such information, however, can prove ethically complex. Should physicians have a referral relationship with local clergy? Is it ethical to pray with patients who make such a request? Can a physician express support for faith-based activities? When is it appropriate to confront a patient’s harmful religious beliefs?

Some authors argue against addressing spiritual issues, calling the activity premature and ethically questionable.¹⁴ Others acknowledge a connection between spiritual faith and health, yet do not agree on the extent to which physicians should address spiritual issues.¹⁵ We elect not to discuss the details of each point of view here, but do emphasize that, despite holding divergent viewpoints, authors seem to agree that guidelines for behavior are lacking. Richard Sloan and colleagues conclude their critique by stating “between the extremes of rejecting the idea that religion and faith can bring comfort to some people coping with illness and endorsing the view that physicians should actively promote religious activity among patients lies a vast uncharted territory in which guidelines for appropriate behavior are needed urgently.”¹⁶

This paper introduces such guidelines in the form of what we call the EBQT Paradigm. With the principles of this paradigm, physicians may personally evaluate or openly debate the ethics of certain spiritual adjuncts to therapy using consistent parameters on which to base their conclusions. Previous authors have developed principles for accommodating the religious beliefs of patients.¹⁷ Others have provided recommendations for the discussion of spiritual issues with patients.¹⁸ However, guidelines for acting on a patient’s spiritual history were not found in a Medline search of the medical literature, including articles and letters from peer-reviewed publications from the last 15 years that refer to or assess the clinical relevance of spirituality, prayer, clergy, religion, or faith.

The EBQT paradigm for spiritual assessment

The EBQT paradigm (Table 1) involves 4 principles: Evidence, Belief, Quality Care, and Time. Used in concert with a spiritual assessment, these principles provide an ethical model with which physicians may evaluate the benefit or harm in addressing spiritual sources of strength or stress in the clinical setting.

TABLE 1
EBQT Paradigm: 4 principles for determining appropriateness of religious/spiritual prescriptive recommendations

Evidence
Does sufficient evidence of good quality exist to recommend this spiritual adjunct to therapy for this patient?
Belief
Does sufficient congruence exist between the patient’s belief, the physician’s belief, and relevance of therapy?
Quality care
Will this recommendation improve the quality of care for this patient?
Time
Can this recommendation be made and implemented within the time constraints of the clinical encounter, respecting the time committed to other patients?

Principle of evidence

Before considering a spiritual adjunct to therapy, evaluate the evidence that supports a therapeutic advantage to such action. Two questions must be answered: 1) does sufficient evidence exist to recommend the action, and 2) what is the quality of that evidence?