Clinical Edge

Summaries of Must-Read Clinical Literature, Guidelines, and FDA Actions

Intravitreous Ranibizumab For Diabetic Retinopathy

Compared with panretinal photocoagulation

Treatment with ranibizumab led to visual acuity that was not worse than panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in a randomized trial of 305 adults with proliferative diabetic retinopathy conducted at 55 US sites.

Participants were randomly assigned to receive PRP in 1 to 3 visits (n=203 eyes), or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, by intravitreous injection as often as every 4 weeks (n=191 eyes). All patients were able to get ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Among the results:

• Average visual acuity improvement at 2 years was +2.8 in those receiving ranibizumab vs +0.2 for PRP.

• The average treatment group difference in visual acuity area under the curve over 2 years was +4.2.

• Average peripheral visual field sensitivity loss was worse, vitrectomy was more frequent, and DME development was more frequent in those receiving PRP vs ranibizumab.

• Rates of major cardiovascular events were similar in both groups.

Citation: Gross J, Glassman A, Jampol L, et al. Panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A randomized clinical trial. [Published online ahead of print November 13, 2015]. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15217.