1-Minute Consult

Is hemoglobin A1c an accurate measure of glycemic control in all diabetic patients?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Comorbidities

Chronic illnesses can cause fluctuation in hemoglobin A1c and make it unreliable. Uremia, severe hypertriglyceridemia, severe hyperbilirubinemia, chronic alcoholism, chronic salicylate use, chronic opioid use, and lead poisoning all can falsely increase hemoglobin A1c levels.

Vitamin and mineral deficiencies (eg, deficiencies of vitamin B12 and iron) can reduce red blood cell turnover and therefore falsely elevate hemoglobin A1c levels. Conversely, medical replacement of these deficiencies could lead to higher red blood cell turnover and reduced hemoglobin A1c levels.

Blood transfusions. Recent reports suggest that red blood cell transfusions reduce the hemoglobin A1c concentration in diabetic patients. This effect was most pronounced in patients who received large transfusion volumes or who had a high hemoglobin A1c level before the transfusion.14

Renal failure. Patients with renal failure have higher levels of carbamylated hemoglobin, which is reported to interfere with measurement and interpretation of hemoglobin A1c. Moreover, there is concern that hemoglobin A1c values may be falsely low in these patients because of shortened erythrocyte survival. Other factors that influence hemoglobin A1c and cause the measured levels to be misleadingly low in renal failure patients include use of recombinant human erythropoietin, the uremic environment, and blood transfusions.15

It has been suggested that glycated albumin may be a better marker for assessing glycemic control in patients with severe chronic kidney disease.16

Medications and supplements that affect hemoglobin

Drugs that may cause hemolysis could lower hemoglobin A1c levels. Examples are dapsone, ribavirin, and sulfonamides. Other drugs can change the structure of hemoglobin. For example, hydroxyurea alters hemoglobin A into hemoglobin F, thus lowering the hemoglobin A1c level. Chronic opiate use has been reported to increase hemoglobin A1c levels through mechanisms yet unclear.

Aspirin, vitamin C, and vitamin E have been postulated to interfere with hemoglobin A1c measurement assays, although studies have not been consistent in demonstrating these effects.

Labile diabetes

In some patients with diabetes, blood glucose levels are labile and oscillate between states of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, despite optimal hemoglobin A1c levels.17 In these patients, the average blood glucose level may very well correlate appropriately with the glycated hemoglobin level, but the degree of control would not be acceptable. Fasting hyperglycemia or postprandial hyperglycemia, or both, especially in the setting of significant glycemic variability over the month before testing, may not be captured by the hemoglobin A1c measurement. These glycemic excursions may be important, as data suggest that this variability may independently worsen microvascular complications in diabetic patients.18

ALTERNATIVES TO MEASURING THE GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN

When hemoglobin A1c levels are suspected to be inaccurate, other tests of the adequacy of glycemic control can be used.19

Continuous glucose monitoring is the gold standard and precisely shows the degree of glycemic variability, usually over 5 days. It is often used when hypoglycemia and wide fluctuations in within-day and day-to-day glucose levels are suspected. In addition, we believe that continuous monitoring could be used to confirm the validity of hemoglobin A1c testing. In a clinical setting in which the level does not seem to match the fingerstick blood glucose readings, it can be a useful tool to assess the range and variation in glycemic control.

This method, however, is not practical in all diabetic patients, and it certainly does not have the same long-term predictive prognostic value. Yet it may still have a role in validating measures of long-term glycemic control (eg, hemoglobin A1c). There is evidence that using continuous glucose monitoring periodically can improve glycemic control, lower hemoglobin A1c levels, and lead to fewer hypoglycemic events.20 As discussed earlier, patients who have labile glycemic excursions and higher risk of microvascular complications can still have “normal” hemoglobin A1c levels; in this scenario, the use of continuous glucose monitoring can lead to lower risk and better control.

1,5-anhydroglucitol and fructosamine are circulating biomarkers that reflect short-term glucose control, ie, over 2 to 3 weeks. The higher the average blood glucose level, the lower the 1,5-anhydroglucitol level, since higher glucose levels competitively inhibit renal reabsorption of this molecule. However, its utility is limited in renal failure, liver disease, and pregnancy.

Fructosamines are nonenzymatically glycated proteins. As markers, they are reliable in renal disease but are unreliable in hypoproteinemic states such as liver disease, nephrosis, and lipemia. This group of proteins represents all of serum-stable glycated proteins; they are strongly influenced by the concentration of serum proteins, as well as by coexisting low-molecular-weight substances in the plasma.

Glycated albumin is superior to glycated hemoglobin in reflecting glycemic control, as it has a faster metabolic turnover than hemoglobin and is not affected by hemoglobin-opathies. Unlike fructosamines, it is not influenced by the serum albumin concentration. Moreover, it may be superior to the hemoglobin A1c in patients who have postprandial hypoglycemia.21

Interestingly, recent cross-sectional analyses suggest that fructosamines and glycated albumin are at least as strongly associated with microvascular complications as the hemoglobin A1c is.22

BE ALERT TO FACTORS THAT AFFECT GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN

Hemoglobin A1c reflects exposure of red blood cells to glucose. Multiple factors—pathologic, physiologic, and environmental—can influence the glycation process, red blood cell turnover, and the hemoglobin structure in ways that can decrease the reliability of the hemoglobin A1c measurement.

Clinicians should be vigilant for the various clinical situations in which hemoglobin A1c is hard to interpret, and they should be familiar with alternative tests (eg, continuous glucose monitoring, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, fructosamines) that can be used to monitor adequate glycemic control in these patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

FDA to probe saxagliptin’s heart failure risk
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Pseudomyocardial Infarction in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Clinical and Diagnostic Dilemma
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
ADA backs second gestational diabetes screening option
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
NIH and pharma partner on RA, lupus, diabetes, Alzheimer’s research
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Obesity epidemic overshadows rarity of pediatric T2D
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
The future of obesity treatments could include endoscopically placed devices
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Curb vaccine-preventable diseases in diabetes patients
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Diabetes Morbidity Varies with Patient Age, Disease Duration
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
ADA Backs Second Gestational Diabetes Screening Option
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Curb Vaccine-preventable Diseases in Patients with Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI