Original Research

Retrospective Analysis of Liraglutide as Add-On Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Quantifying the Changes in Insulin Requirements

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

As Table 1 indicates, 100% of patients were male, and mean (SD) age was 65.5 (9.3) years.

Mean (SD) body weight was 255.0 (52.5) lb, mean (SD) body mass index was 37.4 (6.1), and mean (SD) HbA1c level was 9.0% (2.0).

After 3 months of therapy with liraglutide, HbA1c levels were reduced by a mean of 1.0% (P = .005) (Table 2).

Results showed a trend, but it was a nonsignificant reduction in amount of insulin required. Mean reduction in basal insulin dose was 11%, and mean reduction in bolus insulin was 33% (Figures 2 and 3).
Interestingly, the majority of liraglutide prescriptions were initiated by nonphysicians (74%), either nurse practitioners or pharmacists.

Discussion

After 3 months of treatment with liraglutide, patients experienced a significant decrease in HbA1c levels. Insulin doses also decreased, but this finding was not statistically significant after correcting for multiple testing. These results are similar with those in larger studies of the effectiveness of liraglutide and the addition of liraglutide to insulin therapy. 6,8,12,13 Liraglutide has been shown to decrease HbA1c levels, lower rates of progression of kidney failure, decrease weight, and provide cardiovascular benefit.

In a prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of adding liraglutide to insulin therapy, 21 of the 37 patients who had T2DM and required more than 100 total units of basal-bolus insulin daily were initiated on liraglutide, and changes in HbA1c level, body weight, and glycemic variability were compared. Results showed statistically significant improvement in all 3 outcomes in the group treated with liraglutide.6 Our findings, in conjunction with those of the larger studies, suggest that many of these results are generalizable to our local veteran population. Importantly, liraglutide was successfully started in pharmacy clinics—an indication that this treatment need not be initiated by an endocrine specialist.

Limitations

Given the lack of gender and racial diversity in this study population, our findings have limited generalizability to other populations. It is possible that, with a larger sample size, these results regarding reduced basal insulin doses would be significant. It has been hypothesized that patients experience fewer episodes of hypoglycemia when insulin doses are reduced, but we were unable to measure the frequency of these episodes. Other study limitations include inability to assess adherence and inability to account for concurrent regimens and/or for lifestyle changes that may have been made during the study period. Further, the study did not collect data on changes made to current DM medication regimens during the study period, and these changes may have influenced outcomes.

Conclusion

Patients who require treatment intensification for insulin-dependent T2DM may benefit from having liraglutide added to their basal-bolus insulin regimen. Liraglutide may prove to be more favorable than bolus insulin when choosing add-on therapy to basal insulin. Benefits include reductions in insulin doses, HbA1c levels, number of daily injections, and body weight. Therefore, we suggest that empirically reducing basal insulin by 10% to 25% and bolus insulin by 25% to 50% will avoid relative hypoglycemia. Prescribers must keep in mind patient-specific factors when adjusting insulin doses, if these doses are adjusted at all. Follow-up of 2 to 4 weeks is recommended for review of home monitoring of glucose for further insulin adjustments.

This study has important clinical implications. First, the finding of a reduction in HbA1c levels supports use of liraglutide therapy for HbA1c reduction in veterans. Second, the number of veterans who were successfully initiated on liraglutide therapy by nonphysician providers indicates that liraglutide can be effectively and safely started in primary care pharmacy clinics, increasing access to the medication.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Oral GLP-1 receptor agonist pioneered in T2DM trial
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Lessons learned from the PCSK9 inhibitor trials
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
(Sponsored) Video Roundtable: Basal Insulin Pharmacology
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
SGLT inhibitor still possible for T1DM, despite FDA committee vote
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Insulin may be toxic to the placenta in early pregnancy
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Gastric Electric Stimulation for Refractory Gastroparesis
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Roux-en-Y achieves diabetes remission in majority of patients
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Intensive insulin added no benefit for hyperglycemia after ischemic stroke
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
SGLT2 inhibitors morph into HF drugs
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI
Consider adopting the MESA 10-year CHD risk calculator
Type 2 Diabetes ICYMI

Related Articles