Clinical Review

Bias in Research

Author and Disclosure Information

Bias is a systematic inconsistency in research that contaminates the primary comparison. There are several forms of bias, and there are specific methods of minimizing them in different study designs. The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard to which all other study designs are compared. However, errors can be made at various stages of a RCT that introduce bias. Furthermore, not all questions can be addressed by a RCT, and in some cases another study design may be more appropriate. Observational studies are more prone to bias, but, when properly conducted with rigorous methods to minimize bias, these studies can be valuable in clinical research.


 

Recommended Reading

Peer-Reviewed Articles in Spine Surgery
MDedge Surgery
Measurement of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis After Burst Fracture: Evaluation of Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Variability of 4 Measurement Methods
MDedge Surgery
Evaluation of Total Disc Arthroplasty: A Canine Model
MDedge Surgery
Comparison of Single-Level Cervical Fusion and a Metal-on-Metal Cervical Disc Replacement Device
MDedge Surgery
Influence of Orthopedic Implant Structure on Adjacent Bone Density and on Stability
MDedge Surgery
Evaluation of Autologous Platelet Concentrate for Intertransverse Process Lumbar Fusion
MDedge Surgery
When the Obvious Is Not So Obvious
MDedge Surgery
Neurologic Injuries After Total Hip Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Talar Osteosarcoma in an Elderly Woman
MDedge Surgery
A Rare Case of Osteosarcoma and Rhabdomyosarcoma at the Same Site 7 Years Apart
MDedge Surgery