Clinical Review

The Prevention and Treatment of Femoral Trial Head Loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming an increasingly common procedure. Although this procedure is frequently performed, intraoperative complications still arise; therefore, methods of preventing and ameliorating these complications must be devised. One such complication is the loss of the femoral trial head component within the patient.

Loss of the trial head has been documented in THA cases that have used a number of different surgical approaches.1 Although it is uncommon to lose the trial within the pelvis, it is not an entirely unlikely phenomenon. The possibility of such an event makes prevention important, especially given the associated morbidity that loss of the component could cause. Fortunately, there are preventative measures that can be taken to minimize the probability of losing the femoral trial head, in addition to techniques that can be utilized if prevention fails.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

PREVENTION

Firstly, it is important to avoid the use of worn-out femoral trial components. It is thought that the incidence of femoral trial head loss is increased when the trunnion is older and has been used repeatedly.2,3 Therefore, it is advised that the use of worn femoral trial stems and other older trial components be avoided.

When the femoral trial head disengages anteriorly, it has the potential to enter the pelvis/retroperitoneal space.2,4 The femoral trial head may move more freely in the absence of resistance offered by the anterior capsule.4 Therefore, when extensive anterior capsular dissection has taken place, such as during extensive capsulectomy, caution should be exercised when manipulating the hip. This emphasizes the necessity to closely monitor the head during any manipulation, particularly in the presence of significant anterior capsule disruption.

Modular hip arthroplasty prosthetics allow for various intraoperative changes to be made to the femoral component, providing greater specificity to the prosthesis.5 However, the modularity of the femoral component has been described as a factor contributing to loss of the femoral trial head.4 This also has been discussed with respect to the implantable prosthetic femoral head itself because of disengagement from the femoral stem during reduction and dislocation.4

Continue to: Case reports have cited...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Does Preoperative Pneumonia Affect Complications of Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery?
MDedge Surgery
VIDEO: Hip, knee replacements fall in Danish RA patients
MDedge Surgery
Management and Prevention of Intraoperative Acetabular Fracture in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture After Steroid Injections in Patients With Medicare
MDedge Surgery
Use of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Improves Early Ambulation After Total Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior and Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
MDedge Surgery
Genotype-guided warfarin dosing reduced adverse events in arthroplasty patients
MDedge Surgery
For women with RA, small-joint surgery rate nearly twice that of men
MDedge Surgery
Does Knowledge of Implant Cost Affect Fixation Method Choice in the Management of Stable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?
MDedge Surgery
Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemiarthroplasty: US National Trends in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures
MDedge Surgery
Study links RA flares after joint replacement to disease activity, not medications
MDedge Surgery