Law & Medicine

Shinal v. Toms: It’s Now Harder to Get Informed Consent


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Shinal v. Toms, J-106-2016, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Decided: June 20, 2017.

2. Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, 805 A.2d (PA, 2002).

3. Informed-consent ruling may have “far-reaching, negative impact.” AMA Wire, Aug 8, 2017.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Safety issues not that unusual in medical offices
MDedge Surgery
Dr. Britt awarded NIH grant to develop strategies to address health care disparities
MDedge Surgery
The future needs more surgeons
MDedge Surgery
Five outside-the-box ideas for fixing the individual insurance market
MDedge Surgery
Young adults lead the ranks of recently insured
MDedge Surgery
Medicare fee schedule: Proposed pay bump falls short of promise
MDedge Surgery
Trump administration ends DACA program, stranding medical students
MDedge Surgery
Hurricane Harvey tests Houston physicians’ mettle
MDedge Surgery
Sen. Alexander seeks quick, passable steps to stabilize individual markets
MDedge Surgery
Florida health officials prepare for Hurricane Irma
MDedge Surgery