News

Rheumatologists support biosimilars, with caveats


 

References

Finally, the ACR position statement recommended that biosimilars have distinctive names to easily distinguish them from their reference agents. Otherwise, name confusion could lead to prescribing errors and mistakes during surveillance for adverse events, the organization said.

“We will continue to follow the various issues surrounding the distribution, monitoring, and reimbursement of biosimilars very closely as state and federal policies are proposed that affect our patients and the rheumatologists who serve them,” Dr. St.Clair concluded. “Ensuring patients have easy access to affordable treatment options and rheumatology care continues to be a high priority for us.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

Home-administered biologics for RA more common with Medicare Part D subsidies
MDedge Rheumatology
CMS: Stage 3 meaningful use by 2018
MDedge Rheumatology
House votes to repeal SGR, reauthorize CHIP
MDedge Rheumatology
Doctors hail House vote to repeal, replace SGR
MDedge Rheumatology
Senate recesses without addressing SGR repeal bill
MDedge Rheumatology
Commonwealth Fund: ACA’s medical loss ratio rule saves $5 billion
MDedge Rheumatology
Analysis: ACA didn’t flood physicians’ offices with new, sicker patients
MDedge Rheumatology
The ABIM sends a follow-up letter
MDedge Rheumatology
Supreme Court won’t hear IPAB challenge
MDedge Rheumatology
Supreme Court: Docs cannot sue over low Medicaid payments
MDedge Rheumatology