Conference Coverage

Bimekizumab calms psoriatic arthritis in phase 3 ‘BE’ trials


 

AT THE EULAR 2022 CONGRESS

BE OPTIMAL efficacy

In this study, which had the same eligibility criteria as BE COMPLETE, patients were randomly assigned in a 2:3:1 ratio to receive 16 weeks of treatment with either placebo, bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks, or adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks as a reference treatment.

This trial also met its primary and ranked secondary endpoints, which were similar to those of BE COMPLETE but also included measures of pooled resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis and change from baseline in van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (P < .001 for all comparisons).

In all, 43.9% of patients who received bimekizumab and 45.7% who received adalimumab achieved ACR50 at week 16, compared with 10% of patients who received placebo. The difference between the placebo and bimekizumab groups was significant (P < .001).

Safety

More patients who received the two active agents in this trial had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in comparison with those in the placebo arm, but the incidence of serious TEAEs was less than 2% in each arm.

The most frequent events were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, diarrhea, and hypertension.

Patients tolerated bimekizumab well, and there were no unexpected safety signals, Dr. McInnes said.

Clues to efficacy

In the question-and-answer session following Dr. McInnes’ presentation, Ronald Van Vollenhoven, MD, of the University of Amsterdam, said, “I have a question that is sort of generic in studies of psoriatic arthritis, so it does not only apply to this study, but the skin responses seem to be excellent – PASI90 sounds wonderful – but given that this is the case, is it reasonable to claim that the study is double-blinded in respect to the joints?”

Dr. McInnes replied that while he has considered this conundrum for many years in trials of drugs for psoriatic arthritis, “it doesn’t seem to be a major determinant of the outcome.”

The studies were supported by UCB Pharma. Dr. Merola and Dr. McInnes have consulted for UCB and other pharmaceutical companies that market drugs for psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. Dr. Van Vollenhoven has received research support, has consulted for, and has spoken on behalf of UCB and other pharmaceutical companies.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Meta-analysis evaluates degree of skin involvement in patients with PsA vs only psoriasis
MDedge Rheumatology
PsA: Baseline disease activity predicts achievement of treatment targets with apremilast
MDedge Rheumatology
Meta-analysis evaluates impact of bDMARD on QoL in PsA
MDedge Rheumatology
Secukinumab safe and effective as a first-line biologic for PsA
MDedge Rheumatology
IL-22 may serve as a biomarker of response to TNFi and IL-17i in PsA
MDedge Rheumatology
Abortion debate may affect Rx decisions for pregnant women
MDedge Rheumatology
Commentary: Factors in Psoriatic Arthritis Development and Treatment Response, June 2022
MDedge Rheumatology
Serum brodalumab levels linked with treatment outcomes in patients with psoriasis
MDedge Rheumatology
Izokibep improves multiple psoriatic arthritis symptoms in phase 2 study
MDedge Rheumatology
Biologics, Women, and Pregnancy: What’s Known?
MDedge Rheumatology