Conference Coverage

Biosimilar switch accepted by most rheumatic disease patients


 

REPORTING FROM BSR 2018


“We know our biologic costs are incrementally increasing, but it’s still very hard for some patients to get onto these drugs,” Dr. Kitchen said. She hopes that with the cost-savings being made from the switch, it could help with negotiations to lower the threshold at which patients become eligible for biologic/biosimilar use, thus enabling more patients in need to be treated.

“I think these data have given confidence that patients can switch onto a biosimilar, and that the real-world experience matches what we’re seeing in trials,” Dr. Kitchen said. “We haven’t had a negative experience, and that’s what patients and we were worried about.”

In a separate poster presentation, Kavina Shah, MBBS, and her associates from Northwick Park Hospital, London, reported their experience of switching 115 patients with RA from etanercept to the biosimilar Benepali between January and June 2017.

They conducted a prospective study in which patients were offered an education session and then attended a clinic appointment set up to manage the switch. Patients were assessed by various objective and subjective means before and 4 months after the switch.

Dr. Shah and her associates found that 43% of patients were pleased with the switch. Part of the reason patients might have been happy with the switch was the easier mode of administration, they observed: “Patients commented on the easier technique and less manual dexterity required.”

However, almost a quarter (23%) of patients were not happy with the switch, with others being indifferent (7%) or unsure (8%).

Patients were also asked how they felt their RA was after the switch, and 75% responded that it was no different, 11% said it had improved, and 17% said it was worse.

The mean Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) values were significantly lower in patients after the switch than before (2.66 vs. 2.97; P = .0019). “This could be explained by the lower levels of immunogenicity with Benepali,” Dr. Shah and her coauthors wrote on their poster. Alternatively, it could be an artifact introduced by lower rates of anxiety at follow-up, they said.

There were also statistically nonsignificant improvements in health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scores.

Taken together, these findings are “reassuring,” Dr. Shah and her associates noted, and “should positively encourage clinicians and patients to switch to biosimilars in order to optimize the cost saving to the NHS.”

Not all biosimilar switches may go as smoothly as switching from TNF inhibitors, as Muhammad K. Nisar, MBBS, reported in another poster presentation at the conference. Dr. Nisar, a consultant rheumatologist for Luton (England) and Dunstable Hospital University Trust, reported his center’s experience of switching patients on rituximab (Rituxan) to biosimilar rituximab (Truxima).

Of 44 patients who were established on rituximab, 39 were eligible to make the switch. Four patients had stopped taking rituximab before the switch took place and one patient remained on the originator. As of October 2017, 24 (61.5%) of patients had actually made the switch.

“All were happy to switch after receiving a letter and having the opportunity to contact if necessary,” Dr. Nisar reported. “At group level there were no major differences in disease outcomes and 80% reported no issues.”

However, five (20%) patients developed a severe serum sickness reaction early on with loss of efficacy. This happened in the first week after the second dose of the biosimilar was given, Dr. Nisar explained. No obvious reason could be found, but two patients required emergency hospital treatment within 24 hours.

“Our experience of switching rituximab patients is certainly not as smooth as it was for infliximab or and etanercept,” Dr. Nisar said. While he said “they support routine switching from originator to biosimilar,” he noted that “close monitoring is required, certainly in the first week of dose administration.”

All authors had nothing to disclose.

SOURCES: Hoque T et al. Rheumatology. 2018 Apr 25;57(Suppl. 3):key075.296. Shah K et al. Rheumatology. 2018 Apr 25;57(Suppl. 3):key075.456. Nisar MK. Rheumatology. 2018 Apr 1;57(Suppl. 3):key075.516.

Pages

Recommended Reading

TNF inhibitor linked to one-third drop in total mortality
MDedge Rheumatology
Serum troponin predicts cardiovascular death in early arthritis
MDedge Rheumatology
Checkpoint inhibitors in autoimmune disease: More flares, better cancer outcomes
MDedge Rheumatology
Severe OA sparks depression, surgery “ameliorates” depression in RA
MDedge Rheumatology
Heart failure confers poor prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis
MDedge Rheumatology
IMAGINE-RA: No need for MRI with treat-to-target strategy
MDedge Rheumatology
Glucocorticosteroid use raises sarcopenia risk in RA
MDedge Rheumatology
EULAR recommendations on steroids: ‘As necessary, but as little as possible’
MDedge Rheumatology
High RA biologic drug levels linked with more infections
MDedge Rheumatology
Pain remains after rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis
MDedge Rheumatology