Feature

A health plan ‘down payment’ is one way states are retooling individual mandate


 


Jason Levitis, a senior fellow at Yale Law School’s Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy who has been instrumental in helping states craft their own versions of the individual mandate, warned that Maryland’s approach could face administrative challenges.

States that follow an approach more closely modeled after the federal mandate, he said, will have an easier time implementing it because regulators have already had 5 years of experience enforcing it.

Still, Mr. Levitis praised the Maryland plan: “There’s something attractive about the idea there, that you put this money … towards coverage.”

And a sampling of state proposals highlight a common theme.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Supreme Court declines to hear DACA case
MDedge Rheumatology
Expert argues for improving MACRA, not scrapping it
MDedge Rheumatology
Americans support the right to affordable health care
MDedge Rheumatology
Risking it all on the miracle of teamwork
MDedge Rheumatology
CMS issues split decision on Arkansas Medicaid waiver
MDedge Rheumatology
Preparing to respond to workplace violence
MDedge Rheumatology
Payers part of the drug-pricing problem, says FDA commissioner
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: High deductibles harm breast cancer care
MDedge Rheumatology
Opioid prescriptions got shorter in 2017
MDedge Rheumatology
MDedge Daily News: Time to raise the bar on diabetes blood sugar levels
MDedge Rheumatology