From a neurophysiologic perspective, mental states may be viewed as arising from synchronized integration of the activity of functionally specialized brain regions. Functional neuroimaging of dissociation supports an understanding of these symptoms as ‘disconnection syndromes.’
Functional neuroimaging. Different ‘identities’—sometimes called a traumatic personality state and neutral personality state—demonstrate different patterns of cerebral blood flow, subjective reports, and peripheral physiologic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate).a
Functional imaging of traumatic dissociation shows active suppression of limbic regions (amygdala) and increased activity in dorsolateral prefrontal areas.b Similarly, neuroimaging of depersonalization disorder show increased neural activity in prefrontal regions associated with affect regulation and decreased activity in emotion-related areas.c,d
Speed. Dissociative responses occur extremely rapidly. Using EEG, which allows finer temporal resolution than functional imaging studies, Kirino et ale showed reversible attenuation of a specific EEG signal within 300 msec during dissociative episodes. This ultra-rapid neural reflex was correlated with allocation of attentional and working memory resources, perhaps with the goal of minimizing memory activation and resurgence of affect-laden memories.e
Hormonal. Stress-related disorders cause perturbations in neurohormonal function. Simeon et alf found a distinct pattern of stress-induced HPA axis dysregulation in dissociative patients compared with PTSD patients and healthy controls. Similar results were seen in patients with borderline personality disorder and dissociative symptoms.g
Structural imaging. Stress-related neurohormonal perturbations are known to affect critical neural structures, including the hippocampus. Using MRI, Vermetten et alh found significantly decreased amygdala and hippocampal volumes in patients with dissociative identity disorder.
EEG: electroencephalography; HPA: hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; PTSD: posttraumatic stress disorder
Reference Citations: click here
Causes of dissociative disorders
As with many psychiatric disorders, the etiology of dissociative phenomena is thought to include the individual patient’s temperamental or constitutional predispositions11 as well as a strong contribution of environmental trauma (early abuse, neglect).12
Constitutional predisposition for developing a dissociative disorder may include personality traits such as being easily hypnotized, mental absorption, suggestibility, and a tendency to fantasize.13 These characteristics fueled concerns in the 1990s that therapists may contribute to dissociative identity disorder by “digging” for repressed memories in susceptible patients and creating “pseudomemories” of events that did not happen.14
The issue of repressed traumatic memory and its role in therapy is extremely controversial and contributes to the complexity of psychotherapeutic treatment of dissociation.15
- shame and secrecy of early sexual or physical abuse and potential for victims to repress traumatic memories
- lability of memory, potential for suggestibility, and difficulty with verification.14
- early relationships are one of the primary ways that humans learn to regulate distress
- early trauma frequently includes pathology in caregiving relationships, including overt role reversal, abuse, and neglect.
Finally, remember that transient dissociative symptoms can be considered normal in high-stress situations. Intensive military training has been found to be associated with a very high incidence (96%) of dissociative symptoms in army recruits.17
Identifying ‘hidden’ phenomena
Dissociative disorders have been called “diseases of hiddenness”18 because:
- Many of their clinical characteristics— sense of identity, memory, connectedness, somatosensory phenomena—are alterations in subjective phenomena that lack clearly observable symptoms.
- Patients are often reluctant to seek help or divulge their symptoms to clinicians.
- When dissociative symptoms are obvious—such as multiple personalities or sudden loss of memories—they may be dismissed or evoke skepticism because of their dramatic presentation.
For more targeted screening, the self-report Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES)21 is useful for clinical assessment in conjunction with the clinician-administered diagnostic Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorder (SCID-D).22
Table 2
With these findings, consider screening for dissociation
