Commentary

More on the travesty of pre-authorization


 

We were delighted to read Dr. Nasrallah’s coruscating editorial about the deceptive, unethical, and clinically harmful practice of insurance companies requiring pre-authorization before granting coverage of psychotropic medications that are not on their short list of inexpensive alternatives (“Pre-authorization is illegal, unethical, and adversely disrupts patient care.” From the Editor, Current Psychiatry. April 2020, p. 5,10-11). Obtaining pre-authorization is time-consuming for busy doctors, often prohibitively so—and sometimes simply impossible, regardless of the time and effort invested. In this way, insurers can cleverly withhold optimal treatment while still being able to assert that they will cover all “medically necessary” treatments, as initially determined by a nonphysician reviewer working from a checklist. In a recently published survey of 1,000 psychiatrists we conducted (Barnett BS, Bodkin JA. A survey of American psychiatrists concerning medication prior authorization requirements. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020;208(7):566-573), respondents predominantly believed the obligation to obtain prior authorization negatively impacts patient care and reduces psychiatrists’ job satisfaction.

Brian S. Barnett, MD
Staff Psychiatrist
Cleveland Clinic
Lutheran Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio

J. Alexander Bodkin, MD
Chief
Clinical Psychopharmacology
Research Program
McLean Hospital
Harvard Medical School
Belmont, Massachusetts

Disclosures: The authors report no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

I thank Dr. Nasrallah for bringing up the issue of pre-authorization in his editorial and could not agree with him more. As a practicing geriatric psychiatrist—for several decades—I experienced all of what he so nicely summarized, and more. The amount and degree of humiliation, frustration, and (mainly) waste of time have been painful and unacceptable. As he said: It must be stopped! The question is “How?” Hopefully this editorial triggers some activity against pre-authorization. It was time somebody addressed this problem.

Istvan Boksay, MD, PhD
Private psychiatric practice
New York, New York

Disclosure: The author reports no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

Continue to: I thank Dr. Nasrallah...

Pages

Recommended Reading

COVID-19 and the precipitous dismantlement of societal norms
MDedge Psychiatry
New-onset psychosis while being treated for coronavirus
MDedge Psychiatry
How to best use digital technology to help your patients
MDedge Psychiatry
Daily Recap: Transgender patients turn to DIY treatments; ACIP plans priority vaccine groups
MDedge Psychiatry
Skin patterns of COVID-19 vary widely
MDedge Psychiatry
Potential new biomarker for psychosis severity
MDedge Psychiatry
Many physicians live within their means and save, survey shows
MDedge Psychiatry
Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials launching in July, expert says
MDedge Psychiatry
Managing pain expectations is key to enhanced recovery
MDedge Psychiatry
Daily Recap: Docs are good at saving money; SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials advance
MDedge Psychiatry