Evidence-Based Reviews

Chief complaint: Homicidal. Assessing violence risk

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Consider using a structured tool, such as the Classification of Violence Risk, to help identify Mr. F’s risk factors for violence, or some other formal method to ensure that the proper data are collected. Violence risk assessments are more accurate when structured risk assessment tools are used, compared with clinical judgment alone.

It is important to review collateral sources of information. In Mr. F’s case, useful collateral sources may include his criminal docket (usually available online), past medical records, information from the shelter where he lives, and, potentially, friends or family.

Because Mr. F is making threats of targeted violence, be sure to ask about attack-related behaviors (Table 130).

Regarding the seriousness of Mr. F’s intent to cause harm, it may be helpful to ask him the following questions:

  1. How likely are you to carry out this act of violence?
  2. Do you have a plan? Have you taken any steps toward this plan?
  3. Do you see other, nonviolent solutions to this problem?
  4. What do you hope that we can do for you to help with this problem?

Continue to: Mr. F's answers...

Pages

Recommended Reading

The DNA of psychiatric practice: A covenant with our patients
MDedge Psychiatry
The Goldwater Rule and free speech, the current 'political morass', and more
MDedge Psychiatry
Strategies for working with patients with personality disorders
MDedge Psychiatry
Treating psychosis in patients with HIV/AIDS
MDedge Psychiatry
Aggressive outbursts and emotional lability in a 16-year-old boy
MDedge Psychiatry
‘Nocebo’ effects: Address these 4 psychosocial factors
MDedge Psychiatry
Career Choices: Directorship/leadership
MDedge Psychiatry
‘Robotripping’: What residents need to know
MDedge Psychiatry
Tardive dyskinesia: Screening and management
MDedge Psychiatry
Is medical aid in dying suicide?
MDedge Psychiatry