From the Editor

The toxic zeitgeist of hyper-partisanship: A psychiatric perspective

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Having a political orientation is perfectly normal, a healthy evidence of absence of indolent apathy. However, the unconstrained fervor of political extremism can be as psychologically unhealthy as lethargic passivity. A significant segment of the population may see some merit on both sides of the gaping political chasm, but they are appalled by the intransigence of political extremism, which has become an impediment to the constructive compromise that is vital for progress in politics and in all human interactions.

Beliefs are a transcendent human trait. Homo sapiens represent the only animal species endowed by evolution with a large prefrontal cortex that enables each of its members to harbor a belief system. It prompts me to propose that Descartes’ famous dictum “I think, therefore I am” be revised to “I believe, therefore I am human.” But while many beliefs are reasonable and anchored in reality, irrational beliefs are odd and ambiguous, ranging from superstitions and overvalued ideas to conspiracy theories and cults, which I wrote about a decade ago.1 In fact, epidemiologic research studies have confirmed a high prevalence of subthreshold and pre-psychotic beliefs in the general population.2-5 Thus, radical political partisanship falls on the extreme end of that continuum.

The zeitgeist generated by extreme partisanship is intellectually stunting and emotionally numbing. Psychiatrists may wonder what consequences the intense anger and antipathy and scarcity of compromise between the opposing parties will have for the country’s citizens. Although psychiatrists cannot repair the dysfunctional political fragmentation at the national level, we can help patients who may be negatively affected by the conflicts permeating the national scene when we read or watch the daily news.

Just as it is disturbing for children to watch their parents undermine each other by arguing ferociously and hurling insults, so it is for a populace aghast at how frenzied and intolerant their leaders and their extremist followers have become, failing to work together for the common good and adversely impacting the mental health zeitgeist.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Decreasing suicide risk with math
MDedge Psychiatry
4 Ways to help your patients with schizophrenia quit smoking
MDedge Psychiatry
The stigma toward BPD
MDedge Psychiatry
Rapid weight loss, irritability, and nausea after restarting ADHD treatment
MDedge Psychiatry
Antipsychotics for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Weighing risks vs benefits
MDedge Psychiatry
Neurodegenerative aspects of psychiatric disorders
MDedge Psychiatry
Obesity, psychiatric disorders, and pregnancy
MDedge Psychiatry
Children’s behavioral problems tied to mothers’ postpartum depression
MDedge Psychiatry
Preventive health: Getting rid of the middleman (uh-oh, that’s us!)
MDedge Psychiatry
APOE4: Elders with allele benefit from lifestyle changes
MDedge Psychiatry