His research group is now in the midst of a clinical trial designed to answer two key questions: Is I-CBT for OCD as effective as face-to-face CBT? And is the therapist really necessary in order to achieve optimal outcomes in I-CBT?
“It would be a kind of shock to us if all our therapist impact is for nothing, but we’ll find out soon,” he promised.
Dr. Rück and his coinvestigators recently developed a program for therapist-supervised I-CBT for patients with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). In a single-blind pilot clinical trial involving 94 adults with BDD, the clinical response rate at 6 months of follow-up as defined by at least a 30% reduction from baseline in scores on the BDD–Y-BOCS was 56% in the I-CBT arm and 13% in controls assigned to online supportive care. The number needed to treat was impressively low, at 2.3. And those results were achieved by clinical psychology students having no prior experience with BDD, although they were closely supervised by an experienced clinician (BMJ. 2016 Feb 2;352:i241.
Dr. Rück has been disappointed to find that physicians, psychotherapists, and health care systems have been slow to embrace I-CBT for the conditions where there is solid supportive randomized trial evidence. I-CBT has been implemented within health care systems only in Australia and Stockholm County, the places where most of the research has been conducted.
“The literature has been around for about 15 years now, and we are noticing that the rollout of this is terribly slow. I’m starting to think that the health care system itself is one of the most problematic roadblocks, especially with regard to reimbursement issues. Maybe I-CBT should be offered outside of the health care system. Sometimes I think Google would do this better than a nationalized health care system,” the psychiatrist mused.
He reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.