Commentary

Point/Counterpoint – Should the IADPSG criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes be adopted now worldwide?


 

Dr. de Valk and I have reviewed the published arguments for and against changing the diagnostic criteria for GDM now, and we have other concerns, including the timing and poor reproducibility of the OGTT, the reliance on large for gestational age as an endpoint for setting diagnostic criteria, and the increase in use of oral antidiabetic drugs that could result from a vast increase in GDM.

Overall, we agree with the National Institutes of Health panel that real evidence for change is lacking, and that there is a lot to be done before we significantly expand GDM.

Dr. Visser is professor of obstetrics and gynecology at University Medical Center in Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Based on presentations made at the annual meeting of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of North America, Washington. Both Dr. Coustan and Dr. Visser reported that they had no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Breastfeeding linked to less obesity in Asian children
MDedge ObGyn
Almost 70% of Louisiana adults are overweight or obese
MDedge ObGyn
Pilot study: Mindfulness stress reduction benefits diabetes patients
MDedge ObGyn
Switching nonadherent to denosumab improved bone density
MDedge ObGyn
Ultrasound helped reveal high-risk thyroid nodules
MDedge ObGyn
Adult diabetes rate highest in West Virginia
MDedge ObGyn
Follow-up bone mineral density didn’t sharpen fracture risk assessment
MDedge ObGyn
Phthalate effect on fecundity varies according to gender
MDedge ObGyn
Bone mineral density identifies fracture risk in women over 65
MDedge ObGyn
Unsuspected primary hyperparathyroidism common in fibromyalgia patients
MDedge ObGyn