From the Editor

Colorectal cancer screening, 2021: An update

Author and Disclosure Information

The American Cancer Society now recommends screening for colorectal cancer starting at age 45 years, not 50. The best colorectal cancer screening test is the one that the patient will complete. Colonoscopy and the multitarget stool FIT-DNA test (Cologuard) are the screening tests most likely to detect precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer.


 

References

Colorectal cancer is a common disease that has a very lengthy natural history of progression from small (<8 mm) to large (≥8 mm) polyps, then to dysplasia, and eventually to invasive cancer. It is estimated that this progression takes 10 years.1 The long natural history from preneoplasia to cancer makes colorectal cancer an ideal target for screening. Screening for colorectal cancer is divided into two clinical pathways, screening for people at average risk and for those at high risk. Clinical factors that increase the risk of colorectal cancer are listed in TABLE 1. This editorial is focused on the clinical approach to screening for people at average risk for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death

The top 6 causes of cancer death in the United States are2:

  • lung cancer (23% of cancer deaths)
  • colon and rectum (9%)
  • pancreas (8%)
  • female breast (7%)
  • prostate (5%)
  • liver/bile ducts (5%).

In 2020 it is estimated that 147,950 people were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, including 17,930 people less than 50 years of age.3 In 2020, it is also estimated that 53,200 people in the United States died of colorectal cancer, including 3,640 people younger than age 50.3 By contrast, the American Cancer Society estimates that, in 2021, cervical cancer will be diagnosed in 14,480 women and 4,290 women with the disease will die.4

According to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study, among people 50 to 64 years of age, 63% report being up to date with colorectal cancer screening—leaving a full one-third not up to date with their screening.5 Among people aged 65 to 75, 79% report being up to date with colorectal cancer screening. Among those aged 50 to 64, those with health insurance were more likely to be up to date with screening than people without insurance—67% versus 33%, respectively. People with a household income greater than $75,000 and less than $35,000 reported up-to-date screening rates of 71% and 55%, respectively. Among people aged 50 to 64, non-Hispanic White and Black people reported similar rates of being up to date with colorectal screening (66% and 65%, respectively). Hispanic people, however, reported a significantly lower rate of being up to date with colorectal cancer screening (51%).5

A weakness of this CDC study is that the response rate from the surveyed population was less than 50%, raising questions about validity and generalizability of the reported results. Of note, other studies report that Black men may have lower rates of colorectal cancer screening than non-Black men.6 These data show that focused interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening are required for people 50 to 64 years of age, particularly among underinsured and some minority populations.

Continue to: Inequitable health outcomes for colorectal cancer...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Obstetric units place twice as many wrong-patient orders as medical-surgical units
MDedge ObGyn
FDA to revise statin pregnancy contraindication
MDedge ObGyn
Hematologic cancer increases risk of delivery complications
MDedge ObGyn
Hyperimmune globulin fails to prevent congenital CMV infection
MDedge ObGyn
Nearly half of female surgeons surveyed lost a pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
ACOG, SMFM urge all pregnant women to get COVID-19 vaccine
MDedge ObGyn
New moms latched on to remote breastfeeding help. Will demand wane as pandemic fades?
MDedge ObGyn
Task force affirms routine gestational diabetes testing
MDedge ObGyn
Specific COVID-19 antibodies found in breast milk of vaccinated women
MDedge ObGyn
One center’s experience delivering monochorionic twins
MDedge ObGyn