Feature

ACOG, ACP voice ‘deep concern’ over potential Title X changes


 


If patients lose access to such services through Title X–funded facilities, they may not have another option within reasonable proximity, said Ms. Erickson. She added that options that exist for the population likely to be affected are often community health centers already operating under significant resource constraints.

Title X does not currently fund any abortion services.

Ms. Erickson said that it’s not currently clear whether any proposed changes or limitations would include proscriptions on discussing contraceptive methods. She and Dr. Lawrence said that neither ACP nor ACOG would anticipate initiating or joining litigation against the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services or the administration. On the telebriefing, each representative said that their organizations would need to know what form Title X changes might take, and then see what the nature of any lawsuits would be, before endorsing litigation.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Does hormonal contraception increase the risk of breast cancer?
MDedge ObGyn
Does immediate postpartum LNG-IUD insertion negatively affect breastfeeding outcomes?
MDedge ObGyn
Court: State cannot sue over religious exemption expansion
MDedge ObGyn
MDedge Daily News: Stem cells may reverse premature menopause
MDedge ObGyn
Efavirenz-based ART may hamper vaginal ring contraception
MDedge ObGyn
FDA orders new restrictions on sale, distribution of Essure
MDedge ObGyn
How does oral contraceptive use affect one’s risk of ovarian, endometrial, breast, and colorectal cancers?
MDedge ObGyn
LARC uptake surged immediately after Trump’s election
MDedge ObGyn
MDedge Daily News: How Trump’s election affected contraception
MDedge ObGyn
Pregnancy and safety rates evaluated for Liletta at 5 years of use
MDedge ObGyn