FDA/CDC

FDA approves certolizumab label update for pregnancy, breastfeeding


 


In the CRADLE study, 56% of 137 breast milk samples from 17 mothers had no measurable certolizumab, and the remaining samples showed minimal levels of the biologic. No serious adverse reactions were noted in the 17 infants in the study.

“It is well recognized that women with chronic inflammatory disease face uncertainty during motherhood given the lack of information on treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Many women with chronic inflammatory disease discontinue their biologic treatment during pregnancy, often when they need disease control the most,” said CRADLE lead study author Megan E. B. Clowse, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., in a press release issued by UCB. “These data for Cimzia provide important information to empower women and healthcare providers making decisions about treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding.”

UCB said that limited data from an ongoing pregnancy registry regarding the use of certolizumab in pregnant women are not sufficient to inform a risk of major birth defects or other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Steroid use down, biologic use rising in pregnancies of women with rheumatic disease
MDedge ObGyn
ACR: Etanercept during pregnancy doubles the odds of major malformations
MDedge ObGyn
Biologic treatment in pregnancy requires balancing risks
MDedge ObGyn
PIANO study provides insight on safety of biologics in pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Birth outcomes unaffected by paternal immunosuppressive therapy
MDedge ObGyn
Study offers reassuring data on certolizumab use in pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Breast milk doesn’t contain meaningful levels of certolizumab pegol
MDedge ObGyn
Symptoms don’t worsen during pregnancy in most PsA patients
MDedge ObGyn
Bone fractures more likely to occur in psoriasis, PsA patients
MDedge ObGyn
Get ready for certolizumab for psoriasis
MDedge ObGyn

Related Articles