Law & Medicine

Duty vs. confidentiality


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. Some of the materials have been taken from earlier columns in Internal Medicine News. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Wa. 2016).

2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976).

3. Thompson v. County of Alameda, 167 Cal. Rptr. 70, 76 (1980).

4. Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(3):325-43.

5. AMA Code of Medical Ethics [2.24 (3), 2012-2013 ed].

6. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, 2017 ed. [3.2.1 Confidentiality].

Pages

Recommended Reading

Is the patient-centered medical home on life support?
MDedge ObGyn
Proposed MACRA participation threshold gets mixed reviews
MDedge ObGyn
HHS Secretary resigns amid flight criticism
MDedge ObGyn
Ruling: Apologies can’t be used against doctors in court
MDedge ObGyn
HCA is the country’s highest-volume health system
MDedge ObGyn
U.S. House passes 20-week abortion ban
MDedge ObGyn
Now missing in EHR charts: a good impression
MDedge ObGyn
MIPS: It’s time to get started
MDedge ObGyn
Death by meeting
MDedge ObGyn
Trump administration narrows contraceptive mandate
MDedge ObGyn