News

Trial: Deep Brain Stimulation Eases Depression Symptoms

View on the News

DBS for Depression – Promising but Still Preliminary

Although the study holds a promise, it can’t be seen as a done deal, Dr. Kim J. Burchiel said in an accompanying editorial (J. Neurosurg. 2011 [Epub doi: 10.3171/2011.7.JNS111075]).

"This was an open-label trial and, as such, it cannot be regarded as evidence of efficacy; only safety can be assessed to some degree," he wrote. "A 29% improvement rate at 1 year is modest and may be consistent with a placebo response."

However, he noted, the idea that deep brain stimulation could effectively treat refractory depression is an alluring one that must be pursued.

"The possibility that deep brain stimulation may someday be proven to be efficacious for medically intractable depression has produced substantial interest in both psychiatry and neurological surgery. One can envision that this would represent a major milestone in functional neurosurgery."

Considering the long disengagement of psychiatry and surgery, accepting a neurosurgical treatment for a mood disorder could challenge both the medical community and patients.

"I believe that we can all agree that if this therapy is to advance and mature, it must be rigorously proven to be both safe and effective. On this point, there can be no doubt."

Dr. Burchiel is the John Raaf Professor and chairman of the department of neurological surgery at the Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.


 

FROM THE JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY

Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate area appears to significantly decrease the symptoms of treatment-resistant depression.

An open-label trial of 21 patients who had failed multiple medical and electroconvulsive treatments found that the electrical implants improved depression scores in up to 62% of patients, Dr. Andres M. Lozano reported in the November issue of the Journal of Neurosurgery (Epub doi: 10.3171/2011.10.JNS102122).

Photo courtesy St. Jude Medical Inc.

The Libra deep brain stimulation system sends mild electrical pulses to a specific target in the brain from a device implanted in the chest. This investigational device was developed by St. Jude Medical Inc.

A prior study (J. Neurosurg. 2009;111:1209-15), showed similar positive results but was conducted only at a single center. The new study, with data on patients from three different facilities, confirms the procedure’s success, and speaks to its reproducibility in varied hands, said Dr. Lozano of the University of Toronto and his coauthors.

"The results of this multicenter study suggest that the [subcallosal cingulate gyrus] can be reliably targeted for [deep brain stimulation] electrode implantation and that the clinical effects of [the procedure] for [treatment-resistant depression] are robust and reproducible across centers."

Dr. Lozano and his colleagues reported on 21 patients who underwent deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression at the universities of Toronto and British Columbia, and at McGill University in Montreal. All patients had failed repeated medical therapies; 90% had undergone electroconvulsive therapy that proved ineffective. All of the patients had also received psychotherapy. Despite treatment, their depressive symptoms remained serious: (mean Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score 47; mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD-17] score, 28).

The patients were a mean of 47 years old and reported a mean of seven episodes of major depression during their lifetime. The current major depressive episode had lasted a mean of 5 years.

Researchers initially chose the subcallosal cingulate gyrus because it is involved in processing the emotion of acute sadness. It also seems to be overactive in subjects with treatment-resistant depression; this theory is supported by observation that some effective treatments reduce blood flow or metabolic activity in the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG), the authors said.

During surgery, bilateral SCG targets were identified by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. The electrodes were inserted into the targets and fixed to the skull. The surgeon then connected the electrodes to a pulse generator located in the infraclavicular region.

The mean stimulation amplitude after surgery was 4.2 mA, increasing to 4.9 at 6 months, and 5.2 at 12 months.

Patients were considered responders if they experienced at least a 50% reduction in the HRSD-17 score. At 1 month, 57% were classified as responders; at 6 months, 48%, and by 12 months, 29%.

The reductions in depressive symptoms were associated with global improvements in the patients, the authors said. "Patients shifted from being severely ill to being less ill after surgery, and the majority of patients improved with surgery. At 12 months, none of the 20 patients who remained in treatment were worse than at baseline." According to a graph in the paper, the actual number of patients who improved was 15 at 3 months, 13 at 6 months, and 13 at 12 months.

When evaluated with the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) rating scale, 70% were categorized as severely or extremely ill at baseline, while, at 1 year after surgery, 80% experienced clinical improvement and none rated as severely or extremely ill.

One patient committed suicide by drug overdose in the 8th postsurgical week. Another patient attempted suicide between the week 4 and week 5 follow-up visits. "The underlying trigger was thought to be a family matter," the authors noted.

Nine patients reported nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, although it was unclear whether those adverse events were related to stimulating that region of the brain. One patient experienced a lead extension malfunction immediately after surgery, which required replacing the extension. Another patient experienced superficial skin erosion over a bur site, about 7 weeks after the implant was activated; the incision was revised and this resolved.

Other side effects included headache more than 1 month after surgery (six patients), agitation in reaction to amplitude increase (three), dizziness (three), polyuria (two), and weight gain, buzzing in the ears, and insomnia (one each).

The authors also addressed the apparent decrease in effectiveness by 1 year, saying it could be "somewhat of an artifact of the data analysis." Most patients continued to do well: Depression scores improved by 50% or more in a third of the patients, and 62% experiencing an improvement of at least 40%. But, the investigators said, four of the patients who improved the most dropped to the 40% improvement range by 1 year, "a small change that is likely noise, but which has a large impact when using the 50% cutoff for response in a series with a relatively small number of participants."

Pages

Recommended Reading

Study Finds Signs of Progression to Clinically Definite MS
MDedge Psychiatry
Prescription Pain Pill Overdoses Quadrupled In Last Decade
MDedge Psychiatry
FDA Issues Draft on Opioid Prescribing Education Program
MDedge Psychiatry
Pridopidine Shows Positive Signs for Motor Function in Huntington's
MDedge Psychiatry
Autistic Brains Have an Excess of Prefrontal Neurons
MDedge Psychiatry
Researchers Claim EEG Detects Awareness in Vegetative Patients
MDedge Psychiatry
Subspecialty Arises From Interest in Care of Athletes, Soldiers
MDedge Psychiatry
Aggression May Follow Moderate to Severe TBI
MDedge Psychiatry
Prescribing Opioids for Pain Requires Careful Approach
MDedge Psychiatry
Spine Pain + Fibromyalgia Flag Resistance to Standard Therapy
MDedge Psychiatry