Summaries of Must-Read Clinical Literature, Guidelines, and FDA Actions
Impedance Drift Assessed in Deep Brain Stimulation
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov; ePub 2018 Mar 26; Wong, et al
The drift in impedance in deep brain stimulation (DBS), observed primarily within the first 6 months, is in keeping with prior studies and is likely due to surgical micro-lesioning effects and brain parenchyma remodeling at the electrode-tissue interface. This according to a recent study examining retrospective data from 1,764 electrode leads that were drawn from 866 DBS patients enrolled in the University of Florida Institutional Review Board-approved INFORM database and analyzed up to 84 months post-implantation. An exploratory analysis was conducted to identify trends in impedances using a Mann-Kendall test of trend. Researchers found:
- The majority of subjects had Parkinson disease (60.7%).
- The mean age at implantation was 58.7 years old and the mean follow-up time was 36.8 months.
- There were significant fluctuations in the mean impedance of all electrodes analyzed that largely stabilized by 6 months except for the subthalamic nucleus (STN) target, in which fluctuations persisted throughout the duration of follow-up with a continued downward trend.
- The differences in impedance trends over time in the various DBS targets may be due to underlying differences in structure and tissue composition.
Wong J, Gunduz A, Shute J, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of impedance drift in deep brain stimulation cases. [Published online ahead of print March 26, 2018]. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov. doi:10.7916/D8M62XTC.