Hitting a Nerve

Malpractice cases serve to warn about careful use of EHRs


 

References

Buy our EHR. Come to a dinner and see our EHR. Our EHR is the best.

I hear that a lot, but am not rushing out to get one. Yes, I have an EHR, but it’s one I designed myself. It works very well for my dinky little practice, and I’m happy with it.

I get notes from practices that use commercial EHRs all the time. They’re usually a pile of gobbledygook, mixing labs, vital signs, medication lists, and ICD-10 codes that tell you absolutely nothing about the patient or the physician’s thought process.

Dr. Allan M. Block

Dr. Allan M. Block

Recently, while reviewing malpractice cases, I saw some where I thought that the EHR was contributing to the problem. Medication lists that showed everything a patient had ever taken, without showing when some were discontinued. Prescribing lists that allowed you to enter only certain doses or schedules, therefore blocking the physician from tailoring them to a specific person’s needs. Physical exam forms that allowed only positive or negative answers, with nowhere to comment on unusual findings.

Of course, I’m just one person, so I thought “maybe it’s just me.” After all, a lot of practices out there use EHRs.

But apparently I’m not the only one. A recent report by one of the nation’s largest doctor-owned malpractice companies found that EHRs may increase the risks of liability and medical errors. In 2013, The Doctor’s Company found 28 closed claims where the EHR contributed, and 26 in just the first half of 2014.

These include both technological problems with the systems and human error in their use. Troubles included erroneous medication dose and schedules, diagnosis-related errors, and the sadly common pitfall of cutting and pasting previous notes without modification.

Medicine has always been, and will always be, a thinking profession, and trying to have computers take part of this job off of us is never good. EHRs, while they have advantages in convenience and space savings, are as imperfect as those who write them.

Patients are not one-size-fits-all, and individual treatments have to be customized in ways that current systems often don’t recognize, sometimes with sad consequences for all involved.

Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Recommended Reading

Consistent urine screens recommended for patients on opioids
MDedge Internal Medicine
U.S. to jump-start antibiotic resistance research
MDedge Internal Medicine
Sickle cell trait raises exertional rhabdomyolysis risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA grants fast track status to volixibat
MDedge Internal Medicine
Extended-release naltrexone helps alcohol-dependent HIV-positive prisoners transition to community
MDedge Internal Medicine
Driving skills already affected with mild cognitive impairment
MDedge Internal Medicine
New HIV antiretroviral guidelines embrace PrEP, early ART
MDedge Internal Medicine
NIH launches trial of Zika vaccine candidate
MDedge Internal Medicine
MCR-1 gene a growing concern for antibiotic resistance
MDedge Internal Medicine
Rises in LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides tied to lower diabetes risk
MDedge Internal Medicine