News

S.D. voters to decide ‘any willing provider’ question; other state initiatives highlighted


 

References

Similarly, insurance companies would not be required to cover access to the investigational product.

The measure also provides protections for the physician, stating that a state regulatory authority cannot take action against a physician’s license “based solely on a physician’s recommendation to an eligible patient regarding or prescribing for or treatment with an investigational drug, biological product, or device.”

The language of the ballot measure passed the state House on March 4 and state Senate on April 15.

gtwachtman@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

IOM calls for pay for end-of-life planning
MDedge Neurology
AMA calls on vendors, feds to improve usability of EHRs
MDedge Neurology
Congress poised to act on 2015 meaningful use full year reporting requirement
MDedge Neurology
CMS website snafu could lead to penalties for meaningful users
MDedge Neurology
Health experts push flu vaccination for patients and providers
MDedge Neurology
Watchdog finds security lacking at healthcare.gov, two state marketplaces
MDedge Neurology
Members of Congress urge physician pay for end-of-life counseling
MDedge Neurology
Calif. ballot question would drug test docs after adverse event
MDedge Neurology
CMS releases data on $3.5B in industry payments to doctors, teaching hospitals
MDedge Neurology
More docs need to use available Rx-monitoring programs to help curb opioid abuse
MDedge Neurology