Conference Coverage

Oral antiamyloid shows disease-modifying potential Phase 3 trial underway


 

FROM AAN 2023

More accessible option?

Reached for comment, Percy Griffin, PhD, Alzheimer’s Association director of scientific engagement, noted that the “biggest difference between this drug and others is that it is taken orally, rather than delivered through an infusion. This is important and valuable for reducing patient and caregiver burden and increasing ease of use and access.”

It’s also noteworthy that ALZ-801 was not associated with ARIA-E, “which has been reported in other antiamyloid trials and can occasionally be serious,” Dr. Griffin said.

Overall, he said the results are “encouraging, but more work is needed. If studies results continue to be positive, this treatment may provide a more accessible option for people who are at higher risk of ARIA,” Dr. Griffin said.

The study was funded by Alzheon. Dr. Hey is an employee of Alzheon and holds stock in the company. Dr. Griffin has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Food insecurity linked to more rapid cognitive decline in seniors
MDedge Neurology
Obstructive sleep apnea linked to early cognitive decline
MDedge Neurology
Mediterranean diet improves cognition in MS
MDedge Neurology
Early menopause, delayed HT tied to Alzheimer’s pathology
MDedge Neurology
The amazing brain
MDedge Neurology
Ablation for atrial fibrillation may protect the aging brain
MDedge Neurology
Walnuts linked to improved attention, psychological maturity in teens
MDedge Neurology
Unawareness of memory slips could indicate risk for Alzheimer’s
MDedge Neurology
Cautious optimism for new Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers and treatments, expert says
MDedge Neurology
Donanemab bests aducanumab in head-to-head Alzheimer’s trial
MDedge Neurology