Latest News

Roe v. Wade: Medical groups react to Supreme Court decision


 

American Academy of Family Physicians

“The American Academy of Family Physicians is disappointed and disheartened by the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down longstanding protections afforded by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey,” President Sterling N. Ransone Jr., MD, said in a statement.

The organization has 127,600 physician and medical student members.

“This decision negatively impacts our practices and our patients by undermining the patient-physician relationship and potentially criminalizing evidence-based medical care,” added Dr. Ransone.

American College of Physicians

“A patient’s decision about whether to continue a pregnancy should be a private decision made in consultation with a physician or other health care professional, without interference from the government,” President Ryan D. Mire, MD, said in a statement. “We strongly oppose medically unnecessary government restrictions on any health care services,” added Dr. Mire on behalf of the group’s 161,000 members.

American Academy of Pediatrics

“This decision carries grave consequences for our adolescent patients, who already face many more barriers than adults in accessing comprehensive reproductive health care services and abortion care,” President Moira Szilagyi, MD, PhD, said in a statement.

“In the wake of this ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics will continue to support our chapters as states consider policies affecting access to abortion care, and pediatricians will continue to support our patients,” Dr. Szilagyi added.

American Public Health Association

The court’s decision “is a catastrophic judicial failure that will reverberate differently in each state and portends to jeopardize the health and lives of all Americans,” Executive Director Georges C. Benjamin, MD, said in a statement.

American Urogynecologic Society

“The American Urogynecologic Society opposes any ruling that restricts a person’s access to health care and criminalizes the practice of medicine,” the group said in a statement. “This ruling ultimately poses a serious threat to the patient-provider relationship and subsequent decisionmaking necessary to ensure optimal outcomes for patients. As practitioners, we should be free to provide what is in the best interest of our patients.”

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

White children more likely to get imaging in EDs: Study
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Woman who faked cancer gets 5 years in prison
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Surgeons, who see it up close, offer ways to stop gun violence
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Antidiabetes drug costs keep patients away
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
California doctor to pay $9.5 million in Medicare, Medi-Cal fraud scheme
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Top children’s hospitals report includes rankings by region to aid families
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
New law aims to meet crushing need for mental health care professionals
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Heart failure: Medicare cost sharing may put quadruple therapy out of reach
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Advance directives for psychiatric care reduce compulsory admissions
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
‘Can I survive without payments from insurers?’
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management