From the Journals

PCI after TAVR mostly succeeds, some risks identified


 

FROM JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS

Strategies to improve reaccess not resolved

When performing TAVR, other factors that might influence subsequent PCI success includes commissural alignment and positioning, according to Dr. Kim. But he cautioned that there are a number of potential controversies when weighing how to improve chances of post-TAVR angiographic reaccess without compromising the success of valve replacement.

“Lower positioning facilitates coronary access, but unfortunately will increase rates of conduction disturbances,” he noted.

Overall, one of the main messages from this analysis is that “the fear of impaired coronary access [after TAVR] may well be disproportionate to the reality,” according to Neal S. Kleiman, MD, an interventional cardiologist at Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center. Dr. Kleiman wrote an editorial on the registry findings in the same issue of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions).

Yet, he agreed that the issue of angiographic reaccess after TAVR cannot be ignored. Although reaccess after TAVR has so far been “surprisingly rare,” Dr. Kleiman expects cases to increase as more younger patients undergo TAVR. He suggested that interventionalists will need consider this issue when performing TAVR, a point he reemphasized in an interview.

“It is still a concern when recommending TAVR to a patient and still poses challenges to device manufacturers,” said Dr. Kleiman, suggesting that “a new set of skills” will be required to perform TAVR that will optimize subsequent angiographic access and PCI.

Dr. Kim agreed. Ultimately, other challenges, such as PCI performed after TAVR-in-TAVR placement, are likely to further complicate this issue, but he, too, is looking to new devices to minimize the problems.

“It would be desirable to modify the design, especially of long SFPs, to improve access for PCI, and there are ongoing efforts of the manufacturers to achieve this,” Dr. Kim said.

Dr. Kim reported financial relationships with Abbot, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Meril Lifesciences. Dr. Kleiman reported financial relationships with Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic.

Pages

Recommended Reading

FDA class I recall for some Cordis carotid stent systems
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
LAAOS III: Surgical LAA closure cuts AFib stroke risk by one third
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
FLOWER-MI: FFR-guided complete revascularization shows no advantage in STEMI
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Benefit from cooling temps for cardiac arrest does not differ in randomized trial
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Single subcutaneous shot offers fast, potent platelet inhibition in STEMI
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Evidence builds for iPhone 12 interference with cardiac devices
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Simple risk assessment predicts post-PCI ischemic events
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
FDA okays 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy for Abbott’s Xience stents
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
St. Jude to pay $27 million to end DOJ suit over faulty ICDs
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Gender pay gap most pronounced in procedural specialties
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management