Clinical Review

Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis


 

References

Clinical Application

A fully validated algorithm for CVD risk assessment in RA is lacking. Most CVD risk scores from the general population do not contain RA-related factors predictive of CVD but have had more extensive performance testing. In contrast, novel RA-derived CVD risk scores incorporate RA-related factors, but have had limited external validity testing. Additionally, RA-derived risk scores are less likely to be utilized and adopted by primary care providers and cardiologists involved in RA patients’ care. Neither set of risk scores incorporates novel imaging modalities or serum biomarkers, which are most likely to be helpful among individuals at intermediate risk. Therefore, until the performance of RA-specific CVD risk scores can be better established, we recommend the use of nationally endorsed CVD risk scores, with the frequency of reassessment based on CVD risk.

Conclusion

RA patients are at increased risk of CVD and CVD-related mortality relative to the general population. The disproportionate CVD burden seen in RA appears to be multifactorial, owing to the complex effects of systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and pro-atherogenic lipoprotein modifications. Additionally, many traditional CVD risk factors are more prevalent and suboptimally managed in RA patients. To mitigate the increased risk of CVD in RA, primary care and subspecialty providers alike must be aware of this heightened risk in RA, perform frequent assessment of CVD risk, and aggressively manage both traditional and nontraditional CVD risk factors. The management of CVD risk factors is discussed in detail in the second part of this article.

Corresponding author: Bryant R. England, MD; 986270 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6270; Bryant.england@unmc.edu.

Financial disclosures: Dr. England is supported by UNMC Internal Medicine Scientist Development Award, UNMC Physician-Scientist Training Program, the UNMC Mentored Scholars Program, and the Rheumatology Research Foundation Scientist Development Award. Dr. Mikuls is supported by a VA Merit Award (CX000896) and grants from the National Institutes of Health: National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM115458), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R25AA020818), and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (2P50AR60772).

Pages

Recommended Reading

Can higher MAP post cardiac arrest improve neurologic outcomes?
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
‘Payoff will be great’ if we can conquer childhood obesity, expert says
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Cerebral small vessel disease progression linked to MCI in hypertensive patients
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program may be doing more harm than good
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
New diabetes drugs solidify their cardiovascular and renal benefits
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Torrent Pharmaceuticals expands losartan recall
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
SGLT-2 inhibitors promising for heart failure prevention, not treatment
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Obesity paradox applies to post-stroke mortality
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Revised U.S. A fib guidelines revamp anticoagulation
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention, RIP
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management