Supporting the Needs of Stroke Caregivers Across the Care Continuum
Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 2016 December;23(12)
References
Validated instruments have been developed to assess caregiving outcomes, including preparedness, with caregivers who have been providing care for a period of time. For example, the Mutuality and Preparedness Scales of the Family Caregiver Inventory was developed with caregivers 6 months post-discharge [59] and has been validated with stroke caregivers at 3 months post-discharge [60].
Several validated tools are available to assess the caregiver’s changing needs and the effects of care provision on well-being [8,45,61]. For example, the Caregiver Strain Index [62] has been validated in studies with stroke family caregivers [11,28]. Bakas developed 2 scales to specifically assess stroke caregivers post-discharge. The Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale assesses caregiver life changes [63] and the Needs and Concerns Checklist assesses post-discharge caregiver needs [48]. There are many other instruments designed to assess general caregiving outcomes, including depressive symptoms, burden, anxiety, and well-being. For a list relevant tools see Deeken et al [61] and The Selected Caregiver Assessment Measures from the Family Caregiver Alliance [64].
While these scales are helpful for assessing caregivers who are already providing care, they do not capture the gaps in caregiver readiness prior to patient discharge from the institutional setting. Taken together, these studies suggest that assessing readiness and implementing interventions to improve caregiver preparation prior to discharge and assessing and addressing their changing needs over time, from inpatient care to community reintegration, may be important strategies for improving both caregiver and stroke survivor outcomes. These strategies may also facilitate sustainability of the caregiver role over time.
Interventions to Improve Caregiver Outcomes
In a review of 39 articles representing 32 caregiver and dyad intervention studies, researchers from the AHA made 13 evidence-based recommendations. Recommendations with the highest level of evidence indicated that (1) interventions that combined skill-building with psycho-educational programs were better than psycho-educational interventions alone; (2) interventions that are tailored to the individual are preferred over “one-size-fits-all” interventions; (3) face-to-face interventions are preferred, but telephone interventions can be useful when face-to-face is not feasible; and (4) interventions with 5 to 9 sessions are recommended [65]. In a review of 18 studies, Cheng et al confirmed the recommendation that psychoeducational interventions that focused on skill building improved caregiver well-being and reduced stroke survivor heath care utilization [66].
Studies also recommend that families may need family counseling to help them develop positive coping strategies and adjust to their lives after stroke [66]. Stroke survivors and their families experience grief and loss as they begin to realize how the stroke has changed their relationships, roles, responsibilities, and future plans for their lives (eg, work, retirement). While many inpatient rehabilitation facilities may provide services from a neuro-psychologist to discuss post-stroke changes in the brain and possible behavioral and emotional manifestations, referrals for family counseling to address the impact of stroke on the family and community reintegration are seldom provided [9].
Recent interventions have shown promise in improving stroke caregiver outcomes. For example, Bakas et al. completed a randomized controlled trial of an 8-week, nurse-delivered, Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK) intervention [67]. Caregivers in the intervention group with moderate to severe depressive symptoms at baseline demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms and life changes at 8, 24, and 52 weeks. The TASK shows promise because it can reach caregivers in rural and urban areas at a relatively low cost [67].