Feature

New Canadian BC Guidelines Emphasize Personal Choice


 

‘Mammography Saves Lives’

Commenting on the updated guidelines, Janie Lee, MD, professor of radiology at the University of Washington School of Medicine and director of breast imaging at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, both in Seattle, said: “For the USPSTF, benefits of life years gained were also considered, in addition to breast cancer deaths averted. To save more lives from breast cancer, guidelines may focus on screening women at older ages, when annual rates of breast cancer are higher.” By contrast, when thinking in terms of years of life saved, focusing on screening younger women, who have more years of life left, increases benefits. “Both are important outcomes that we want to improve with effective screening.”

That said, “we should follow the guidelines of our specific national organizations,” she continued. “Overall populations and healthcare systems are different between the US and Canada.”

For example, “the USPSTF specifically highlighted the potential for reducing breast cancer mortality in Black women, who are more likely to develop biologically aggressive tumors that are diagnosed at more advanced stages, when making updated recommendations earlier this year,” she said. “The Canadian guidelines did not make specific recommendations by race or ethnicity group, instead highlighting the need for more research on the impact of screening in these groups.”

In addition, “screening every year versus every other year is more routine in the US compared with Canada,” she noted. And nonmedical factors that influence health and that may influence access to medical care and timely diagnosis of breast cancer “may be different between our two countries.”

“The most important take-home message is that the scientific evidence is strong that screening mammography saves lives,” said Dr. Lee. “These new recommendations will hopefully result in more early diagnoses of breast cancer and save more lives. Screening works best when it’s used regularly, regardless of how frequently you return. Once you start screening, please urge your patients to plan to return.”

Dr. Nadler disclosed speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Novartis and Exact Sciences outside the scope of this interview and innovation funding from the NSH/UHN AMO Innovation Fund Competition for Developing and Implementing a Consensus Recommendation for Breast Cancer Screening Best Practices. Dr. Thériault is chair of the task force and chair of the working group for the draft guidelines. Dr. Wittmer is chair of Choosing Wisely Quebec. Dr. Lee reported no relevant financial relationships related to her interview.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Ovarian Cancer Risk Doubled by Estrogen-Only HRT
MDedge Internal Medicine
Surviving to Thriving: Enhancing Quality of Life in Breast Cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine
One Patient Changed This Oncologist’s View of Hope. Here’s How.
MDedge Internal Medicine
Doctors Endorsing Products on X May Not Disclose Company Ties
MDedge Internal Medicine
Oncology Mergers Are on the Rise. How Can Independent Practices Survive?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Time Warp: Fax Machines Still Common in Oncology Practice. Why?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Urticaria Linked to Higher Cancer Risk, Study Finds
MDedge Internal Medicine
Clinical Controversy: Standard Dose or Baby TAM for Breast Cancer Prevention?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Weight Loss Drugs Cut Cancer Risk in Diabetes Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Should Cancer Trial Eligibility Become More Inclusive?
MDedge Internal Medicine