From the Journals

RA precision medicine using synovial biopsy ‘remains elusive’


 

FROM THE LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY

Molecular-level analyses needed

This 2021 study showed – and this most recent study further confirmed – that “histology is not the way to understand what’s going on with or be predictive with tissue,” said Harris R. Perlman, PhD, chief of rheumatology at Northwestern University in Chicago. He was not involved with the research.

Harris R. Perlman, principal investigator for the REASON study, and the Mabel Greene Myers Professor of Medicine and chief of the division of rheumatology at Northwestern University, Chicago Dr. Perlman

Dr. Harris R. Perlman

“Most people now believe that you really have to understand the tissue on a single-cell basis – using the gene expression of each individual cell – to really give you an idea of what’s happening in tissue,” he noted.

“RA continues to tell us that it is more complex than just something dichotomous,” added Elena Myasoedova, MD, PhD, director of the Inflammatory Arthritis Subspecialty Group at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. She was not involved with the work.

Dr. Elena Myasoedova, rheumatologist, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Dr. Myasoedova

Dr. Elena Myasoedova

“Understanding more about the heterogeneity using different ‘-omics’ approaches and introducing a two- or three-dimensional approach with spatial biology can be helpful,” she said.

Spatial transcriptomics, for example, allows scientists to measure all gene activity in a tissue sample and to map where that gene activity is occurring.

“It helps us to understand and visualize molecules and their unique context within individual cells and tissues,” Dr. Myasoedova explained.

With advanced molecular analyses already available, Dr. Perlman is adamant that synovial tissue remains the key to unlocking precision medicine.

“The tissue is the golden ticket,” he said, “but it’s how you analyze it.”

And it’s clear that older analytic methods – such as histology – are not enough, he said.

A larger study of a size similar to that of STRAP that incorporates multiple sources of patient information, from gene expression to clinical symptoms, to create a predictive model would be key to understanding how to move the field of precision treatment for RA forward, he added.

“Precision medicine for RA is close,” he said. “We still have to get the numbers.”

The STRAP and STRAP-EU trials were jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council and Versus Arthritis. Pfizer and Roche donated the study drugs through an investigator-sponsored research grant. Many authors, including Dr. Pitzalis, have multiple financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Van der Helm-van Mil and Dr. Myasoedova have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Perlman consults for AbbVie, AnaptysBio, Exagen, Janssen, and Kiniksa.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Precision blood test for rheumatoid arthritis receives Medicare coverage
MDedge Internal Medicine
Early glucocorticoid bridging in RA supported by meta-analysis, but concerns remain
MDedge Internal Medicine
Extra-articular RA manifestations are in decline, but mortality is still a problem
MDedge Internal Medicine
Patients with rheumatism have premature immune system aging
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA approves first tocilizumab biosimilar
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA approves ninth Humira biosimilar, with interchangeability
MDedge Internal Medicine
Are women and men with rheumatism treated equally?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Biomarkers may help women with RA to decide on medications in pregnancy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Abatacept, certolizumab: Best biologics in early RA
MDedge Internal Medicine
Approximately 20% of U.S. adults are diagnosed with arthritis
MDedge Internal Medicine