Commentary

Why misinformation spreads


 

Are believing and sharing the same?

Interestingly, believing in a headline and sharing it are not the same. A study that investigated the difference between the two found that although individuals were able to discern the validity of headlines, the veracity of those headlines was not a determining factor in sharing the story on social media.

It has been suggested that social media context may distract individuals from engaging in deliberate thinking that would enhance their ability to determine the accuracy of the content. The dissociation between truthfulness and sharing may be a result of the “attention economy,” which refers to user engagement of likes, comments, shares, and so forth. As such, social media behavior and content consumption may not necessarily reflect one’s beliefs and may be influenced by what others value.

To combat the spread of misinformation, it has been suggested that proactive interventions – “prebunking” or “inoculation” – are necessary. This idea is in accordance with the inoculation theory, which suggests that pre-exposure can confer resistance to challenge. This line of thinking is aligned with the use of vaccines to counter medical illnesses. Increasing awareness of individual vulnerability to manipulation and misinformation has also been proposed as a strategy to resist persuasion.

The age old tale of what others think of us versus what we believe to be true has existed long before the viral overtake of social media. The main difference today is that social media acts as a catalyst for pockets of misinformation. Although social media outlets are cracking down on “false news,” we must consider what criteria should be employed to identify false information. Should external bodies regulate our content consumption? We are certainly entering a gray zone of “wrong” versus “right.” With the overabundance of information available online, it may be the case of “them” versus “us” – that is, those who do not believe in the existence of misinformation versus those who do.

Leanna M. W. Lui, HBSc, completed an HBSc global health specialist degree at the University of Toronto, where she is now an MSc candidate.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Sweeping new vaccine mandates will impact most U.S. workers
MDedge Internal Medicine
COVID-19 spares lung function in young adults
MDedge Internal Medicine
Medical boards: Docs who spread COVID misinformation put license at risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Even those who just test positive at more risk for long COVID: CDC
MDedge Internal Medicine
Researchers describe first reports of breakthrough COVID infections, booster shots in rheumatology patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Biden vaccine mandate rule could be ready within weeks
MDedge Internal Medicine
At 18 months, much still unknown about diabetes and COVID-19
MDedge Internal Medicine
Man dies after 43 full ICUs turn him away
MDedge Internal Medicine
Low RA flare rate reported after Pfizer COVID vaccination
MDedge Internal Medicine
Want to see what COVID strain you have? The government says no
MDedge Internal Medicine