Conference Coverage

BERENICE: Further evidence of heart safety of dual HER2 blockade


 

FROM ESMO BREAST CANCER 2021

Discussion points

Dr. de Azambuja noted that the contribution of the chemotherapy to the efficacy cannot be assessed because of the nonrandomized trial design. That should not matter, pointed out Sybille Loibl, MD, PhD, during discussion.

“I think it compares nicely to other trials that looked at dose-dense chemotherapy,” said Dr. Loibl, who is an associate professor at the University of Frankfurt in Germany. “It seems that, in the light of what we consider today probably one of the best anti-HER2 treatments, the chemotherapy is less relevant, and that’s why a dose-dense regimen doesn’t add so much on a standard anthracycline taxane-containing regimen.”

Dr. de Azambuja also commented on the assessment of cardiotoxicity and the use of reduced LVEF as a measure: LVEF decline is a late effect of cardiotoxicity, he observed, and he suggested a different approach in future trials.

“If you use Global Longitudinal Strain, this could be an optimal parameter to detect early subclinical LVEF dysfunction and you should consider it for the next trials looking for cardiac safety. Also, cardiac biomarkers. This was not implemented in this trial, and I strongly recommend this should be for the next trial.”

The BERENICE trial was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr. Dang disclosed receiving consultancy fees from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, and Puma Biotechnology. Dr. de Azambuja was not involved in the study but disclosed receiving honoraria, travel grants, research grants from Roche and Genentech as well as from other companies. Dr. Loibl was one of the cochairs of the session and, among disclosures regarding many other companies, has been an invited speaker for Roche and received reimbursement via her institution for a writing engagement.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Risk-based mammography proposed for times of reduced capacity
MDedge Internal Medicine
Treating metastatic TNBC: Where are we now?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Cancer screening stopped by pandemic: Repercussions to come?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Rankings of most common cancers to shift over next 20 years
MDedge Internal Medicine
Quicker fertility rebound in young women with breast cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine
Cell-free DNA improves response prediction in breast cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA panel backs atezolizumab for mTNBC – at least for now
MDedge Internal Medicine
AHA statement flags CV risk of hormonal cancer therapies
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA panel votes against 2 cancer indications but backs 4 of 6
MDedge Internal Medicine
Breast cancer survivors have specific gynecological needs
MDedge Internal Medicine