From the Journals

BALL score predicts benefit from ibrutinib therapy in relapsed/refractory CLL patients


 

FROM LEUKEMIA RESEARCH

The BALL score was able to identify a subset of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who particularly benefit from single-agent ibrutinib therapy, according to the results of a study of 111 patients followed from two different institutions.

The BALL model consists of four factors: serum beta₂-microglobulin at 5 mg/dL or greater, hemoglobin < 110 g/L for women or < 120 g/L for men, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] > upper limit of normal [UNL], and time elapsed from last therapy less than 24 months. Each parameter was alloted 1 point, leading to a stratification of patients into three different prognostic groups: low risk (score 0-1), intermediate risk (2-3), and high risk (score 4), according to a report published online in Leukemia Research.

According to Stefano Molica, MD, of the Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy, and his colleagues, the majority of patients (82%) were clinical Rai stage II-IV. The median patient age was 63 years and nearly 68% were men.

The researchers assessed four models for predicting overall survival. The modified version of CLL-International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) failed to provide prognostic information in relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL (P = .77) as did the Ahn et al. model (P = .95) and a simplified BALL model (P = .09). In contrast, the full BALL score captured two groups of patients with significant differences in survival (hazard ratio, 0.240; 95 % confidence interval, 0.10-0.54; P = .0005); however, because of the low number of patients in the high-risk category, these cases were combined with the intermediate-risk group.

The BALL score identified a subset of patients, accounting for about 50% of the whole population, who particularly benefit from single-agent ibrutinib, according to Dr. Molica and his colleagues. These patients had a survival rate of 85% at 3 years.

“In contrast, the outcome of subjects with intermediate-high risk is disappointing. These patients should be considered for a combination of targeted drugs or cellular-based therapies,” the researchers concluded.

The authors reported that they had no conflicts.

SOURCE: Molica S et al. Leuk Res. 2020 Jun 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2020.

Recommended Reading

Ibrutinib approved as first-line therapy for all CLL patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA approves venetoclax for CLL with 17p deletion
MDedge Internal Medicine
Maintenance rituximab extends progression-free but not overall survival in CLL
MDedge Internal Medicine
AML leads percent gains in 5-year survival among leukemias
MDedge Internal Medicine
ECG finding predicts AFib in ibrutinib-treated CLL
MDedge Internal Medicine
Deep remission or long-term control? Choice is key in early CLL
MDedge Internal Medicine
9/11 responders show increased risk of leukemia, other cancers
MDedge Internal Medicine
CLL and breast cancer differ in the expression of regulatory microRNAs
MDedge Internal Medicine
Case study shows CLL may mask COVID-19 infection
MDedge Internal Medicine
MCC response varies based on immunosuppression type, especially CLL
MDedge Internal Medicine