Conference Coverage

ESBL-resistant bacteria spread in hospital despite strict contact precautions


 

REPORTING FROM ECCMID 2018

Standard precautions did not require a private bedroom, with gloves, gowns, and apron needed for direct contact to body fluids or wounds only, and consistent hand hygiene. Contact precautions required a private bedroom and strict hand hygiene, with gloves, gowns, and aprons used for any patient contact. Study staff monitored compliance with these procedures monthly.

The primary outcome was the ESBL-E acquisition rate per 1,000 patient days. This was defined as a new ESBL-E detection after the patient had a prior negative screen. Dr. Maechler noted that by epidemiological definition, acquisition does not necessarily imply cross-transmission from other patients.

Adherence to the study protocols was good, she said. Adherence to both contact and standard precautions was about 85%, while adherence to hand hygiene was less at around 62%.

Admission ESBL-E screenings revealed that about 12% of the study population was colonized with the strain at admission. The proportion was nearly identical in the contact and standard precaution groups (11.6%, 12.2%).

Recommended Reading

Reported penicillin allergies hike inpatient costs
MDedge Internal Medicine
Preoperative penicillin allergy tests could decrease SSI
MDedge Internal Medicine
Prehospital antibiotics improved some aspects of sepsis care
MDedge Internal Medicine
Bile spillage during lap cholecystectomy comes with a price
MDedge Internal Medicine
Complication rates rise after decline in uterine fibroid morcellation
MDedge Internal Medicine
Robotic approach falls short for sleeve gastrectomy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Piperacillin-tazobactam tripled risk of death for patients with cephalosporin-resistant septicemia
MDedge Internal Medicine