News

Fecal Occult Blood Testing No Longer Advised


 

New joint consensus guidelines on screening for colorectal cancer recommend against the use of the most common form of the fecal occult blood test and add stool DNA testing and computed tomographic colonography to a list of the recommended screening options.

The guidelines were a joint project of the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology (CA Cancer J. Clin. 2008 March 5 [doi:10.3322/CA.2007.0018]). The Multi-Society Task Force includes representatives from the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

After reviewing the literature and taking into account expert opinion, the panel concluded that any screening test for colorectal cancer should be able to detect the majority of prevalent or incident cancers at the time of testing. Here the panel chose to make a new distinction between “test sensitivity” and “program sensitivity.”

The most commonly used guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBTs), such as Hemoccult II, have relatively low test sensitivity, meaning that a single application of the test has somewhat less than a 50% chance of detecting cancer. Greater sensitivity can be achieved by repeating the test annually, and this is referred to as the program sensitivity.

In view of the fact that patients and physicians do not reliably repeat the test annually, however, the task force recommended that only screening methods with test sensitivities above 50% should be used. The guidelines also state that screening for colorectal cancer with a gFOBT in the office following a digital rectal exam or as part of a pelvic examination “is not recommended and should not be done.”

The task force did not rule out fecal occult blood tests entirely. A new form of the test, called Hemoccult Sensa, has a sensitivity of 64% for cancer and 41% for advanced adenomas according to one study, so the use of high-sensitivity fecal occult blood tests would be acceptable. The task force also stated that immunochemical-based stool tests and stool DNA tests both have acceptable levels of sensitivity.

High-sensitivity fecal occult blood tests and immunochemical-based stool tests should be repeated annually, but the task force said that not enough information is available to make a recommendation on the proper interval for stool DNA testing.

In their recommendations on structural screening tests, the task force concluded that colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy (with insertion to 40 cm or to the splenic flexure), double-contrast barium enema, and computed tomographic colonography (also called virtual colonoscopy) would all be acceptable for individuals at average risk. Beginning at age 50 years, colonoscopy should be repeated every 10 years, and the other structural tests should be repeated every 5 years.

In helping patients decide which structural test to choose, physicians should inform patients about the benefits, limitations, and harms of each test. Some require extensive bowel preparation, and flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy can result in accidental perforations. Positive findings with flexible sigmoidoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, or double-contrast barium enema will require follow-up colonoscopy.

“It is the strong opinion of this expert panel that colon cancer prevention should be the primary goal of CRC screening,” the guidelines read. “Tests that are designed to detect both early cancer and adenomatous polyps should be encouraged if resources are available and patients are willing to undergo an invasive test.”

The updated guidelines focus on individuals with an average risk of developing colorectal cancer, stating that individuals at increased risk and high risk should continue to follow recommendations previously issued by the American Cancer Society or the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force.

For example, most patients with a history of polyps at prior colonoscopy, those with colorectal cancer, and those with a family history should be screened with colonoscopy. Patients with a genetic diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis should be screened annually with flexible sigmoidoscopy beginning at the age of 10–12 years. Those with a genetic or clinical diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer should receive colonoscopy every 1–2 years beginning at age 20–25 years or 10 years before the youngest case in the immediate family.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, chronic ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's colitis should receive colonoscopy with biopsies for dysplasia every 1–2 years beginning about 8 years after the onset of pancolitis or 12–15 years after the onset of left-sided colitis.

The full text of the guidelines is available at http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/full/CA.2007.0018v1

Recommended Reading

Elderly Benefit From Colorectal Cancer Screening
MDedge Internal Medicine
KRAS Status Predicts Response to Colorectal Ca Treatment
MDedge Internal Medicine
Aspirin Plus PPI Safe In Barrett's Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Carvedilol Beats Band Ligation for Variceal Bleed
MDedge Internal Medicine
Prebiotics Show Promise in Crohn's and Colitis
MDedge Internal Medicine
Mesalamine, Folic Acid May Cut Colorectal Ca in IBD Patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
Elderly Benefit From Surgery for Liver Metastases
MDedge Internal Medicine
Colorectal Ca Neurogenesis May Affect Prognosis
MDedge Internal Medicine
Data Watch: Hispanics Account for the Highest Percentage of Adults Aged 50 or Older Who Never Had a Screening Colonoscopy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Follow-Up Care Falls Short After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
MDedge Internal Medicine