Latest News

Court: State cannot sue over religious exemption expansion


 

The legal fight over the ACA’s contraceptive mandate exemption is far from over. The Massachusetts decision comes after federal judges in California and Pennsylvania halted the administration’s exemption rules. In December 2017, U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. temporarily blocked the exemption extension from going forward in favor of California and four other states that joined the lawsuit – New York, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Earlier that month, U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone ruled similarly in a decision for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Both Mr. Gilliam and Ms. Beetlestone were appointed to the bench by President Obama.

The Trump administration has indicated that it plans to appeal the rulings. In a summary of the rules, the administration said the new policies will “better balance the government’s interest in promoting coverage for contraceptive and sterilization services with the government’s interests in providing conscience protections for entities with sincerely held moral convictions.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

FDA extends Liletta IUD duration of use to 4 years
MDedge Internal Medicine
Oral contraceptive use linked to lower rheumatoid arthritis risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Copper IUDs increase bacterial vaginosis risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Trump administration narrows contraceptive mandate
MDedge Internal Medicine
Contraception coverage rollback is discriminatory
MDedge Internal Medicine
Many women have unprotected sex in year after bariatric surgery
MDedge Internal Medicine
Newer hormonal contraception formulations linked to breast cancer risk*
MDedge Internal Medicine
Self-administered subcutaneous Depo-Provera ‘feasible and acceptable’
MDedge Internal Medicine
Contraceptive use appears low in teen girls on teratogenic medications
MDedge Internal Medicine
More savings available from generic oral contraceptives
MDedge Internal Medicine