Latest News

Systematic Viral Testing in Emergency Departments Has Limited Benefit for General Population


 

Future Research

Additional studies should look at testing among subgroups, particularly those with high-risk conditions, the study authors wrote. In addition, the research team would like to study the implementation of novel diagnostic stewardship programs as compared with well-established antibiotic stewardship programs.

“Acute respiratory tract illnesses represent one of the most common reasons for being evaluated in an acute care setting, especially in pediatrics, and these visits have traditionally resulted in excessive antibiotic prescribing, despite the etiology of the infection mostly being viral,” said Suchitra Rao, MBBS, associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and associate medical director of infection prevention and control at Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora.

Dr. Rao, who wasn’t involved with this study, has surveyed ED providers about respiratory viral testing and changes in clinical decision-making. She and colleagues found that providers most commonly changed clinical decision-making while prescribing an antiviral if influenza was detected or withholding antivirals if influenza wasn’t detected.

“Multiplex testing for respiratory viruses and atypical bacteria is becoming more widespread, with newer-generation platforms having shorter turnaround times, and offers the potential to impact point-of-care decision-making,” she said. “However, these tests are expensive, and more studies are needed to explore whether respiratory pathogen panel testing in the acute care setting has an impact in terms of reduced antibiotic use as well as other outcomes, including ED visits, health-seeking behaviors, and hospitalization.”

For instance, more recent studies around SARS-CoV-2 with newer-generation panels may make a difference, as well as multiplex panels that include numerous viral targets, she said.

“Further RCTs are required to evaluate the impact of influenza/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 panels, as well as respiratory pathogen panel testing in conjunction with antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship efforts, which have been associated with improved outcomes for other rapid molecular platforms, such as blood culture identification panels,” Rao said.

The study was funded by the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center. Dr. Schober reported no disclosures, and several study authors reported grants or personal fees from companies outside of this research. Dr. Rao disclosed no relevant relationships.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com .

Pages

Recommended Reading

All-oral regimen succeeds for rifampin-resistant tuberculosis
MDedge Infectious Disease
New COVID variant JN.1 could disrupt holiday plans
MDedge Infectious Disease
New Insights, New Standards: How 2023 Changed Care for Internists
MDedge Infectious Disease
Respiratory Virus Surge: Diagnosing COVID-19 vs RSV, Flu
MDedge Infectious Disease
Healthcare Workers Face Increased Risks During the Pandemic
MDedge Infectious Disease
SARS-CoV-2 a Possible Trigger for Achalasia
MDedge Infectious Disease
Bivalent Vaccines Protect Even Children Who’ve Had COVID
MDedge Infectious Disease
Postinfectious Cough: Are Treatments Ever Warranted?
MDedge Infectious Disease
Risk for Preterm Birth Stops Maternal RSV Vaccine Trial
MDedge Infectious Disease
New Infant RSV Antibody Treatment Shows Strong Results
MDedge Infectious Disease