Research

Prospective validation of a prediction tool for identifying patients at high risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

The primary objective of the current study was to prospectively validate the prediction scoring systems for acute and delayed CINV in an independent sample of patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy.


 

George Dranitsaris, BPharm, PhD, Nathaniel Bouganim, MD, Carolyn Milano, Lisa Vandermeer, MSc, Susan Dent, MD, Paul Wheatley-Price, MD, Jenny Laporte, RN, Karen-Ann Oxborough, RN, and Mark Clemons, MD

Background Even with modern antiemetic regimens, up to 20% of cancer patients suffer from moderate to severechemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) (grade 2). We previously developed chemotherapy cycle–based risk predictive models forgrade 2 acute and delayed CINV. In this study, the prospective validation of the prediction models andassociated scoring systems is described.

Objective Our objective was to prospectively validate prediction models designed to identify patients at high risk for moderate tosevere CINV.

Methods Patients receiving chemotherapy were provided with CINV symptom diaries. Prior to each cycle of chemotherapy, the acute and delayed CINV scoring systems were used to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups. Logistic regression was used tocompare the occurrence of grade 2 CINV between patients considered by the model to be at high vs low risk. The external validity of each system was assessed via an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis.

Results Outcome data were collected from 97 patients following 401 cycles of chemotherapy. The incidence of grade 2 acute and delayed CINV was 13.5% and 21.4%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the risk score and the probability of developing acute and delayed CINV following chemotherapy. Both the acute and delayed scoring systems had good predictive accuracy when applied to the validation sample (acute, AUROC = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.62– 0.77; delayed, AUROC = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.69 – 0.80). Patients who were identified as high risk were 3.1 (P = .006) and 4.2 (P < .001) times more likely to develop grade 2 acute and delayed CINV than were those identified as low risk.

Conclusion This study demonstrates that the scoring systems are able to accurately identify patients at high risk for acute and delayed CINV.

*For a PDF of the full article, click on the link to the left of this introduction.

Recommended Reading

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Panax quinquefolius Extract (CVT-E002) to Reduce Respiratory Infection in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Dr. Mike Fisch tracks the trends from ASCO's Quality Care Symposium
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Live from ASH: Dr. David Henry shares his 'did you know' picks
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
End-of-life care gains increasing prominence
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Thoughts on tragedy, beauty, and perspective
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
'I never know when to call palliative care'
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Online network offers 24/7 patient support
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Initiating palliative care conversations: lessons from Jewish bioethics
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer: the Cleveland Clinic protocol
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Assessment of safety of a rapid desensitization regimen for patients with hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy infusions
MDedge Hematology and Oncology