VALERIAN (N = 102) | PLACEBO (N = 100) | P | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | 0.387 | ||
Female | 82 (80%) | 85 (85%) | |
Age (years) | 0.546 | ||
Mean (SD) | 59.5 (11.95) | 58.3 (12.71) | |
Sleep scale group | 0.963 | ||
Mildly impaired | 67 (66%) | 66 (66%) | |
Moderately or severely impaired | 35 (34%) | 34 (34%) | |
Sleep scale score | 0.841 | ||
Mean (SD) | 6.6 (1.43) | 6.6 (1.69) | |
Primary tumor site | 0.526 | ||
Breast | 64 (63%) | 66 (67%) | |
Colon | 9 (9%) | 5 (5%) | |
Prostate | 3 (3%) | 1 (1%) | |
Other | 25 (25%) | 27 (27%) | |
Tumor status | 0.322 | ||
Resected with no residual | 64 (64%) | 71 (71%) | |
Resected with known residual | 17 (17%) | 12 (13%) | |
Unresected | 19 (19%) | 13 (14%) | |
Treatment type | 0.966 | ||
Radiation therapy | 6 (5.9%) | 6 (6%) | |
Parenteral chemotherapy | 38 (37%) | 39 (39%) | |
Oral therapy | 40 (39%) | 40 (40%) | |
Combined modality | 18 (18%) | 15 (15%) | |
Concurrent radiation | 0.926 | ||
Yes | 23 (23%) | 22 (22%) | |
Concurrent cancer therapy | 0.679 | ||
Yes | 56 (55%) | 52 (53%) | |
Planned or concurrent hormone | 0.667 | ||
Yes | 51 (51%) | 53 (54%) |
VALERIAN (N = 101) | PLACEBO (N = 96) | P | |
---|---|---|---|
PSQI total1 | 0.695 | ||
Mean (SD) | 41.3 (13.92) | 42.4 (14.97) | |
POMS-SF total | 0.883 | ||
Mean (SD) | 65.0 (14.28) | 63.9 (16.46) | |
FOSQ total | 0.927 | ||
Mean (SD) | 73.7 (16.07) | 72.8 (18.37) | |
Fatigue Now | 0.285 | ||
Mean (SD) | 45.7 (24.41) | 49.4 (25.00) | |
Usual Fatigue | 0.216 | ||
Mean (SD) | 46.8 (23.27) | 51.1 (24.73) | |
Worst Fatigue | 0.522 | ||
Mean (SD) | 35.2 (24.67) | 37.9 (26.37) | |
Total Interference | 0.268 | ||
Mean (SD) | 61.4 (25.05) | 57.1 (27.37) |
The primary end point of treatment effectiveness was measured using the normalized AUC calculated using baseline, week 4, and week 8 PSQI total scores. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test P value for the total PSQI score was nonsignificant (valerian AUC = 51.4, SD = 16; placebo AUC = 49.7, SD = 15; P = 0.696) (Figure 2). Similarly the FOSQ was not significantly different between groups either overall or on any subscale score.
Supplemental and exploratory analyses using changes from baseline, however, showed a significant difference in the change from baseline in the amount of sleep at night at week 4 (P = 0.008), favoring the valerian group. Change from baseline in the categorical value for sleep latency was also significantly different at week 4, where 10% of valerian patients indicated longer time to fall asleep compared to 28% on placebo and 43% of valerian patients reported less time to fall asleep compared to 32% on placebo (P = 0.03) (Table 3). The ITT analysis indicated that about 9% more patients experienced a success on valerian relative to placebo, but this was not statistically significant. When scores on the PSQI were divided into ≤5 and >5 (this latter group representing sleep problems), there were fewer patients in the valerian group having sleep problems by week 8 (64% vs 80%, P = 0.56).
VALERIAN | PLACEBO | P | |
---|---|---|---|
Sleep quality | 0.199 | ||
Week 4 | |||
Worse | 2 (3%) | 5 (8%) | |
Same | 33 (49%) | 37 (57%) | |
Better | 33 (49%) | 23 (35%) | |
Week 8 | 0.927 | ||
Worse | 3 (5%) | 2 (3%) | |
Same | 26 (41%) | 25 (42%) | |
Better | 35 (55%) | 32 (54%) | |
Sleep latency | 0.030 | ||
Week 4 | |||
Worse | 6 (10%) | 18 (28%) | |
Same | 30 (48%) | 26 (40%) | |
Better | 27 (43%) | 21 (32%) | |
Week 8 | 0.072 | ||
Worse | 3 (5%) | 11 (18%) | |
Same | 28 (47%) | 29 (48%) | |
Better | 27 (47%) | 21 (34%) | |
Sleep duration | 0.244 | ||
Week 4 | |||
Worse | 6 (9%) | 10 (16%) | |
Same | 26 (39%) | 29 (46%) | |
Better | 34 (52%) | 24 (38%) | |
Week 8 | 0.148 | ||
Worse | 8 (13%) | 4 (7%) | |
Same | 19 (31%) | 28 (48%) | |
Better | 34 (56%) | 27 (46%) | |
Sleep efficiency | 0.295 | ||
Week 4 | |||
Worse | 7 (12%) | 13 (22%) | |
Same | 26 (43%) | 23 (39%) | |
Better | 28 (46%) | 23 (39%) | |
Week 8 | 0.758 | ||
Worse | 11 (19%) | 9 (16%) | |
Same | 19 (33%) | 22 (39%) | |
Better | 28 (48%) | 25 (45%) | |
Sleep disturbance | 0.738 | ||
Week 4 | |||
Worse | 9 (15%) | 11 (18%) | |
Same | 41 (66%) | 40 (67%) | |
Better | 12 (19%) | 9 (15%) | |
Week 8 | 0.177 | ||
Worse | 10 (16%) | 7 (13%) | |
Same | 35 (57%) | 41 (73%) | |
Better | 16 (26%) | 8 (14%) | |
Daytime dysfunction | 0.114 | ||
Week 4 | |||
Worse | 6 (9%) | 13 (19%) | |
Same | 42 (60%) | 40 (60%) | |
Better | 22 (31%) | 14 (21%) | |
Week 8 | 0.478 | ||
Worse | 6 (10%) | 8 (13%) | |
Same | 27 (43%) | 31 (50%) | |
Better | 30 (48%) | 23 (37%) |
While the POMS AUC scores indicated no difference between treatment arms, the mean change from baseline at weeks 4 and 8 was significantly different for the Fatigue-Inertia subscale at weeks 4 (P = 0.004) and 8 (P = 0.02), with the valerian arm reporting better scores (Table 4). On the BFI, the valerian arm scored significantly better than the placebo arm in the mean change from baseline at weeks 4 and 8 on the Fatigue Now (P = 0.003 and P = 0.01, respectively) and Usual Fatigue (P = 0.02 and P = 0.046, respectively) items (Table 4).
SIDE EFFECT | WEEK | VALERIAN | PLACEBO | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
BFI | ||||
Fatigue Now | Week 4 | 13.2 | 1.5 | <0.01 |
Week 8 | 22.1 | 10.5 | <0.01 | |
Usual Fatigue | Week 4 | 12.8 | 4.2 | 0.02 |
Week 8 | 19.4 | 10.0 | 0.05 | |
Worst Fatigue | Week 4 | 11.2 | 3.2 | 0.03 |
Week 8 | 14.8 | 12.4 | 0.65 | |
Activity Interference | Week 4 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 0.75 |
Week 8 | 12.3 | 10.8 | 0.75 | |
POMS | ||||
Anger-Hostility | Week 4 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.53 |
Week 8 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 0.89 | |
Vigor-Activity | Week 4 | 2.0 | -0.4 | 0.43 |
Week 8 | 2.0 | 4.7 | 0.34 | |
Depression-Dejection | Week 4 | 3.7 | 5.5 | 0.21 |
Week 8 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 0.25 | |
Confusion-Bewilderment | Week 4 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.26 |
Week 8 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 0.79 | |
Fatigue-Inertia | Week 4 | 13.9 | 2.8 | <0.01 |
Week 8 | 17.5 | 9.2 | 0.02 | |
TensionAnxiety | Week 4 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 0.85 |
Week 8 | 9.2 | 8.9 | 0.54 | |
Total score | Week 4 | 5.7 | 3.0 | 0.19 |
Week 8 | 6.9 | 6.0 | 0.90 |
In terms of toxicity, there were no significant differences between arms for the self-reported side effect items (headache, trouble waking, nausea) at baseline, week 4, or week 8 (Table 5). The valerian arm change from baseline at both weeks 4 and 8 showed significant improvement in drowsiness (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively) and sleep problems (P = 0.005 and P = 0.03, respectively) compared to placebo (Table 5). The maximum severity over time for each self-reported toxicity resulted in no significant differences between arms. There was a significant difference in the CTCAE reporting of alkaline phosphatase, with the placebo arm having a higher incidence of grade 1 toxicity (P = 0.049).