News from the FDA/CDC

FDA Approves Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Durvalumab for NSCLC


 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved durvalumab (Imfinzi; AstraZeneca) both before and after surgery in patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The agency approved durvalumab alongside platinum-containing chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting and as monotherapy in the adjuvant setting.

The approval comes shortly after a meeting of FDA’s Oncology Drug Advisory Committee, where agency personnel took AstraZeneca to task for not following its request to include an arm in the approval study, AEGEAN, to clarify whether or not treatment after surgery was necessary.

Even so, advisers at the July 25 meeting voted “yes” to approving the neoadjuvant/adjuvant indication to give patients another immunotherapy option in NSCLC. However, the committee voted unanimously that, going forward, the agency should require — instead of simply request — that companies seeking combined neoadjuvant/adjuvant NSCLC indications show that patients actually need treatment after surgery.

The new approval is durvalumab’s first indication for resectable NSCLC. The agent has been previously approved for unresectable or metastatic disease as well as extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, and advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

AEGEAN included 802 patients with previously untreated and resectable stage IIA-IIIB squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either durvalumab (400 patients) or placebo (402 patients) on a background of platinum-based chemotherapy every 3 weeks for four cycles then, following surgery, durvalumab or placebo once a month for a year.

The pathologic complete response rate was 17% in the durvalumab arm vs 4.3% in the placebo arm. At 12 months, event-free survival was 73.4% with durvalumab vs 64.5% with placebo. Overall survival differences have not been tested for statistical significance, but there was “no clear detriment” with durvalumab, FDA said in a press release.

Adverse reactions in 20% or more of durvalumab recipients included anemia, nausea, constipation, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and rash; 1.7% of durvalumab recipients and 1% of placebo recipients could not have surgery because of side effects during neoadjuvant treatment.

The dosage for patients weighing > 30 kg is 1500 mg every 3 weeks before surgery and every 4 weeks afterward. For patients who weigh less than that, the recommended dosage is 20 mg/kg.

Durvalumab costs around $1,053 for 120 mg, according to drugs.com.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Weight Loss Drugs Cut Cancer Risk in Diabetes Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Should Cancer Trial Eligibility Become More Inclusive?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Greater Transparency of Oncologists’ Pharma Relationships Needed
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Calls AstraZeneca’s NSCLC Trial Design Into Question
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ancient Viruses in Our DNA Hold Clues to Cancer Treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The Last 30 Days: How Oncologists’ Choices Affect End-of-Life Cancer Care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Approves First Engineered Cell Therapy for a Solid Tumor
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Can Addressing Depression Reduce Chemo Toxicity in Older Adults?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunotherapy May Be Overused in Dying Patients With Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunotherapy and Survival in Advanced NSCLC: Does Obesity Matter?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology