From the Journals

Even with insurance, cancer out-of-pocket costs can be punishing


 

TOPLINE:

Commercial health insurance does not necessarily protect cancer patients from potentially devastating out-of-pocket costs.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Out-of-pocket costs contribute to financial toxicity in cancer, but little is known about how they vary across various tumor types and stages over time.
  • To find out, investigators reviewed claims data for 7494 US patients diagnosed with stage I-IV breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, ovarian, or prostate cancer from 2016 to 2020.
  • They assessed cumulative out-of-pocket (OOP) costs — defined as copayments, deductibles, and coinsurance — in the first 3 years following diagnosis.
  • Subjects had private, commercial health insurance through United Healthcare.

TAKEAWAY:

  • By the end of 3 years, average cumulative OOP costs ranged from $16,673 for stage I prostate cancer to $35,253 for stage IV lung cancer.
  • Across all cancer types, average OOP costs in the first year ranged from $2,754 for stage I anal cancer to $25,876 for stage IV vaginal cancer.
  • However, the upper limits of OOP costs exceeded $100,000 across many tumors and stages in the first year, reaching a high of $450,374 for stage I breast cancer and far exceeding $200,000 for stage II-IV colorectal and lung cancer.
  • OOP costs were generally highest during the first year of treatment and for cancers diagnosed at later stages.

IN PRACTICE:

“OOP costs may present an extreme economic stressor on patients diagnosed with cancer,” leading to emotional distress, reduced treatment adherence, and poor outcomes. “Even cancer patients with insurance coverage [are] not protected.” Future research is “needed to help clarify the type of patient most burdened by OOP costs” as well as ways to reduce them, including promoting “diagnosis at an earlier stage and increas[ing] access to health plans that minimize patient cost sharing.”

SOURCE:

The work was led by November McGarvey of BluePath Solutions, Los Angeles, and published in the Journal of Medical Economics.

LIMITATIONS:

The study did not include additional OOP costs, such as transportation. It also did not assess the long-term impacts of cancer-related out-of-pocket spending. Details on health plan types and features were limited, and the results are limited to patients with commercial health insurance.

DISCLOSURES:

The work was funded by Grail. The investigators are employees of Grail or BluePath Solutions.

Recommended Reading

Stripped privileges: An alarming precedent for community oncologists?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medicare 2024 base rate cut triggers calls for pay overhaul
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MOC: An ‘insult to oncologists’ engaged in patient care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Prior authorizations interfere with recommended cancer care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FTC considers proposals on mergers and noncompete clauses
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Infographic: Careers that tempt doctors to leave medicine
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Redispensing unused cancer meds cuts waste, saves money
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Why don’t doctors feel like heroes anymore?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Rx for resilience: Five prescriptions for physician burnout
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Eight wealth tips just for doctors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology